Silver Crown's 2013

mr nobody · 10/25/12, 7:41 AM

With the recent change by USAC allowing teams to run methanol or ethanol in 2013, will this be enough to chage things in terms of car counts? I do know of one owner that has said (his words not mine) "If and when USAC comes to their senses and reverts back to methanol, he would get his car back out and run." Are there more that will do this?

I am asking this question to all owners of Silver Crown cars: Will this get you back on track? If not, what will?

Lets keep the BS out of this thread discussion. No attacks no nonsense. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Lets have some real constructive debate.

racephoto1 · 10/25/12, 7:45 AM

I just hope this isn't closing the barn door, after the cow has already escaped from the .

Kellen Conover · 10/25/12, 7:59 AM

I will be bringing my car back out for next season, which has my crew pretty excited as they no longer have to stand in the shop making engine noises while I sit in the car up on the stands.

Posted via Mobile Device

SpfldMile · 10/25/12, 9:34 AM

Kellen, I always thought your car was one of the best looking cars out there. It will be good to see it going fast next year.

fasster23 · 10/25/12, 7:44 PM

We will be fielding a car for the first time in 2013 on the 3 miles and possibly Terre Haute

Posted via Mobile Device

mr nobody · 9/13/13, 6:37 AM

It would appear that the fuel changes didn't bring about the changes that were hoped for. What now is the next move to get this series growing again?

usac99 · 9/13/13, 7:28 AM

Maybe its time Mr. Stoops looked at changing the management.

sprntr · 9/13/13, 3:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by usac99

Maybe its time Mr. Stoops looked at changing the management.

USAC has management??

steiny

koolaid89 · 9/13/13, 3:46 PM

It's a start.... I'd say to really solidify a full field USAC needs to pay 1,000 to start 10,000 to win as a base payout. I know that'd mean taking money out of USAC folks' pockets but some times you have to spend a little to make a little. You can't ride off of the coat tails of the sanctions history forever.

Jonr · 9/13/13, 9:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by koolaid89

It's a start.... I'd say to really solidify a full field USAC needs to pay 1,000 to start 10,000 to win as a base payout. I know that'd mean taking money out of USAC folks' pockets but some times you have to spend a little to make a little. You can't ride off of the coat tails of the sanctions history forever.

SC does not draw well enough at the front gate to make this happen.

9/13/13, 3:46 PM	#9 Re: Silver Crown's 2013
koolaid89 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 918	It's a start.... I'd say to really solidify a full field USAC needs to pay 1,000 to start 10,000 to win as a base payout. I know that'd mean taking money out of USAC folks' pockets but some times you have to spend a little to make a little. You can't ride off of the coat tails of the sanctions history forever. _________________________________________________ Last edited by koolaid89; 9/13/13 at 3:47 PM.

10/25/12, 7:41 AM	#1 Silver Crown's 2013
mr nobody Banned Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 232	With the recent change by USAC allowing teams to run methanol or ethanol in 2013, will this be enough to chage things in terms of car counts? I do know of one owner that has said (his words not mine) "If and when USAC comes to their senses and reverts back to methanol, he would get his car back out and run." Are there more that will do this? I am asking this question to all owners of Silver Crown cars: Will this get you back on track? If not, what will? Lets keep the BS out of this thread discussion. No attacks no nonsense. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Lets have some real constructive debate.

10/25/12, 7:45 AM	#2 Re: Silver Crown's 2013
racephoto1 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 4,253	I just hope this isn't closing the barn door, after the cow has already escaped from the .