Originally Posted by Hamilton71:
When Speedshift streamed the USAC races at Bloomington they gave us a full report of online subscribers. I don't have the reports anymore but when I reviewed the town the IP pinged to it was very few within hours of Bloomington Speedway. We looked at it that people multiple states away wouldn't have traveled that far on a Friday, so any online more than offset the few close we seen. The split with Speedshift was 50% and no upfront cost to the track. If it was a bad weather night and cancelled, we didn't pay Chet or Darrin for their time.
Great info IMHO and FAIR! But I don't think Flo operates the same way Maybe it is a contract between the sanction and flo or the Track and Flo. IDK.
The two numbers I gave (Don K saying they paid 1000 per) and (Kevin Miiler saying 50k viewers per usac race) Lets see, If you got half of Speedshift and 50 watched. $15X50,000 is 750K per event (That's half the speedshift full event price of $30 I don't think any track would be closing down with a couple of those Stream gate incomes. Hell if it was just one dollar per viewer it would be 25k to the track.
If you just took the # of 50k subscribrs at 179.00 that's 8.9 million. and Miller said there was nearly 140k for the BC39 that's 25 million.
All Im saying is there is enough money to put back into racing and still make a healthy profit.
I'll go back to 2020 where flo held about six events at 50k to win. Probably 100k purses with NO FANS. Someone's getting the $$ and Im sure them tracks were either leased by flo or were paid handsomely to hold em.
Don't get me wrong, I love the value of Flo. I probably watch the full shows of over a hundred events and the features of another fifty or more. Sometimes when I get home from a track I went to, I'll watch others features
But I also didn't mind paying full price for a dozen events I couldn't make either Better than reruns.