Home | Register | Quick Links | FAQ | Donate | Contact |
View Poll Results: DII engine specs | |||
allow cycle motors increase to 1400 cc's |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 29.09% |
allow only stock cylinder head and parts no altering |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 36.36% |
alllow aftermarket cam shafts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 27.27% |
allow aftermarket valves |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 30.91% |
allow aftermarket valve springs |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
30 | 54.55% |
allow porting |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 20.00% |
allow porting in older smaller motors |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.18% |
alllow head milling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 36.36% |
allow only stock long blocks with stock components |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 25.45% |
allow aftermarket pistons |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 32.73% |
allow aftermarket rods |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 49.09% |
allow crank lightening |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 21.82% |
allow oiling changes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 49.09% |
allow removal of balancer shafts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 47.27% |
allow wet sump only |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.18% |
allow optonal dry sump oiling |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 47.27% |
allow stock ecu only with flashing |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.18% |
allow aftermarket ecu |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 34.55% |
allow aftermarket ignition for mec injection systems |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 34.55% |
allow gasoline or methanol as fuel |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.18% |
allow methanol only (safety) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
31 | 56.36% |
allow aftermarket injection electronic |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 43.64% |
allow aftermarket injection mechanical |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
27 | 49.09% |
allow bore change to meet displacement |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 25.45% |
allow stroke change to meet displacement |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 23.64% |
allow the use of restricted older National Midget Motors |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
25 | 45.45% |
allow the use of stock smaller forced induction motors as they come on line |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 16.36% |
allow M/C powerd cars to remove clutch and starter |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.18% |
Allow 2.5L Engines |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 30.91% |
I have raced in a DII class in the past |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 34.55% |
I am very interested in DII Midget racing |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 32.73% |
keep min weight as they are 1125>1000>910>875 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 12.73% |
Change min weight of auto engine cars down to 1025 lbs. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 5.45% |
Tow your car on an open trailer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 9.09% |
weiRaise the min weight to accomodate 2014 average male weight of 196 pounds |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 7.27% |
allow OEM Stock VVT |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 16.36% |
VVT must be disabled if aftermarket fuel injection is used |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 5.45% |
no wings |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 9.09% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
10/16/15, 3:52 PM |
#41
Re: New DII Engine rules
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,957 |
America was built with "COMPETITION" the strong win out over the weak. Debate is also a good thing it helps formulate opinions and if done respectfully also brings about change. To date no one has the the perfect solution for Midget or for that mater any other type of racing. Racing will always be regional as grass roots racers tend to stay in their back yards. If a good simple set of rules are devised the grass roots racer will follow them and make adjustments to better suit their particular situation.
No Body has ever written the perfect Country Western Song yet either. ![]() Honest Dad himself ![]() ![]() |
|
|
10/16/15, 4:29 PM |
#42
Re: New DII Engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,957 |
Quote:
Chris According to the dictionary I think you called me George W Bush. ![]() ![]() Honest Dad himself ![]() ![]() |
||
|
10/16/15, 5:28 PM |
#43
Re: New DII Engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 982 |
Dad, You are wrong, Steve Goodman wrote it and David Allen Coe recorded it,
"You never even call me by my Name" check it out on youtube, but, you might want to stay away from some of his other songs. ie. "If that ain't country" Bill May
_________________________________________________
Last edited by Bill May; 10/16/15 at 5:33 PM. Reason: song title |
||
|
10/16/15, 5:48 PM |
#44
Re: New DII Engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,957 |
Quote:
Bill May https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkKn5HrKgHQ Good to see you still around IOW, How did that sprint car do? Best I can remember they had to let Grand Ma out of Prison and she got run over by a Pick Up truck or something like that. Still not perfect in my view. If done right these rules should be on one double spaced sheet of paper. ![]() Honest Dad himself ![]() ![]()
_________________________________________________
Last edited by DAD; 10/16/15 at 5:52 PM. |
||
|
10/16/15, 9:35 PM | #45 | ||
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 27 |
When I ran a 305 sprint and then again when I ran a 360 I was pretty sure there were a few people that had a significant advantage in their engines. I ran a bike motor car with the IMRA this year, and I never once seriously considered it. I thought we were well matched with the outcomes of the races being mostly determined by factors other than power.
From my perspective, the rule package for engines is good as-is. There are no major problems to fix. |
||
|
10/16/15, 10:17 PM |
#46
Re: New DII Engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,957 |
Quote:
It is hard to believe that a 1000cc motor will run with a motor more than twice its size. We need to keep in mind also that these big motors also have a lot of power left in them, but it would take a lot of money to get this power out of them. We already have people that would like to sell somebody this power. We don't need it to put on a good race. The new motors are already moving up in power without their help. Now if these guys want to take one of these motors to the next stage of tune let them do it racing with the National Midget class. Honest Dad himself ![]() ![]() |
||
|
10/16/15, 11:11 PM | #47 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 27 |
Agreed. It would be wise to protect the parity that we have today. I just don't want to mislead any onlookers to think there are already major issues that need to be solved.
The fun/dollar ratio for this kind of racing is pretty high compared to other things I've been involved in. More people should try it. As for the bike motors- they are better on some tracks than others. Their weight distribution sometimes offsets the horsepower disadvantage. That situation is much better than I expected it to be. I will be using an R1 again next year. Motor is usually not the limiting factor on where I finish. ![]() |
|
10/17/15, 12:15 AM | #48 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 500 |
we have been running this deal for 2-3 years, most of the people ******** and gnashing their teeth haven't even run it. Leave it alone, it works. Bike guys win some, shaft cars win some. The good teams and drivers run up front. We run an 06 r1 and have won races on all kinds and sizes of tracks. We've also gotten beat plenty when we weren't right. That's how it's supposed to be. The fun per dollar can't be beat. Run it or don't, but don't tell me that it won't work because we have proven that it will for the last few years.
|
||
|
10/18/15, 9:12 AM | #49 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 57 |
G'day guys, I'm in Australia so obviously things are a little different here for us but having started racing in the early 90's with a 2lt Toyota 16v wet sump engine, no power steering (9 degrees positive castor haha) and have just gotten back in after 18 years away from the sport, a lot has changed except the discussions(arguments). The idea of limiting engine costs is right and I have had a few conversations with Mike Wallace at MWR and out the Ecotec engines and the IRS series. The tyre rule that IRS uses is pretty good, there's only so much power they can put to the ground so a late model national engine like a Toyota or Esslinger is going to be next to useless compared to a 250-300hp engine. I've got a Gearte with a -12 head and is about 8 years old now? With the talk of banning anything that's not a stock block is a bit harsh because I'd guess there would be a lot of open engines more than 5 years old that aren't up to taking on the likes of USAC or POWRi national competition but are still quality and treated right, reliable and not much more to maintain than a stock block engine within reason? My point is give everybody a fair go and say throw 25lb onto an open engine and take 25lb off the rest? And while the pen is still in hand, ban Ti bolts, drivelines etc.
I hope I've made a bit of sense? I have enjoyed reading what you've all had to say and you are all pretty much saying the same things but just using different words?! Cheers Stew
_________________________________________________
Last edited by stew60; 10/18/15 at 9:16 AM. |
||
|
10/18/15, 10:59 AM |
#50
Re: New DII Engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,957 |
Quote:
Stew Good to hear frou you guys south of the equator. I guess you all are just getting ready to go racing we are winding down. The language may change a tad but the concerns remain the same. New racers never even get started after figuring how expensive it is going to be and that is a shame. Midgets racing on a small track have to be close to one of the most entertaining series around. Put them on a 1/2 mile and bigger>>nor so much but a whole lot more dangerous. I have been on a Hoosier or American racer 10" right Rear campaign for a couple of years now but haven't gotten much traction so to speak Ha Ha ![]() Honest Dad himself ![]() ![]()
_________________________________________________
Last edited by DAD; 10/18/15 at 11:00 AM. |
||
|
![]() |