Posted By vitron
7/25/15, 9:11 AM
I've seen some dumb comments on here before, but never as dumb as throwback! Go throw some more back!
Posted By vitron
6/8/15, 8:45 AM
Engine rules are the same, just no rev limit in power I.
Posted By vitron
6/1/15, 10:42 AM
They probably haven't run a 20 lap feature since 1949
Posted By vitron
4/11/15, 2:48 AM
Another decision made by USAC to benefit themselves instead of the teams that support usac. Get rid of a better product with a better price. Still self serving like usual.
Posted By vitron
9/16/14, 8:46 PM
4- F/K 7" internal base valve gas shocks. Gas gauge Cones and rings included. Recent Hummel service done.
$1500.00. Contact wisco95@msn.com
Posted By vitron
9/4/14, 5:28 PM
It's done for the year.......
Posted By vitron
5/26/14, 11:21 PM
All good points, but most do charge an entry fee, including power-I . It's 30 bucks to pull the pill.
Posted By vitron
5/21/14, 8:35 PM
5 years ago at that race they had 40 some cars, look it up! USAC tanked it when they separated the pavement from the national championship. There is still pavement sprints out there and pavement...
Posted By vitron
11/21/13, 8:50 AM
be careful what you wish for, and what does nascrap have anything to do with it?? all you need is a suitcase full of money and your in there. Besides, the last guy that "made it" did his damage on...
Posted By vitron
10/13/13, 12:42 PM
It was an open practice for $50 a car. If the little guy can't afford that....... It is nice that the track owner opened up his track to do that at that price. Pavement racing in general and pavement...
Posted By vitron
10/8/13, 8:23 PM
everybody, every kind of motor.
Posted By vitron
6/24/13, 8:06 PM
hopefully power-I brings more cars than they did to the prairie last night. I think it was 5 or 6.
Posted By vitron
5/24/13, 12:17 PM
Reading the release, I see nothing in USAC's decision to go with honda as a "sponsor" that benefits the competitor. I see new car's and ATV's for the hard workers at the office. Ignite midgets have...
Posted By vitron
12/13/12, 8:16 PM
looks like usac changed their rules mysteriously to get this motor in. This motor should be in the 146cid rule, which is no longer there. they took away the esslinger pinto rule and lumped together...
