Originally Posted by Bubzilla:
That rule has been in effect for many, many years.
Whether you ran "more than" or "fewer than" 51% of the races, you still have to reapply each year. Running more than 51% just reserves the number until a certain date. If you fail to reregister the car by that date, then another car owner can apply for it.
Believe it or not, the Ugly Step Mom will still most likely grant any requests to the "dirt only" car owners to retain their previous numbers.
Bubzilla -- You are dead wrong about this. The new rule about running more than 51% of the races to reserve the number was a new rule that was instituted in 2006 or 2007. Everyone has to reapply every year -- that hasn't changed, but what changed is that an owner has to run more than 51% of the races to hold onto their number. Formerly, as long as you got your entry in by the end of January, you could retain your number. The former rule had nothing to do with the number of races, just as long as you renewed by a certain date.
Reference an article written by Jeff Swindell about a year ago in Sprint Car & Midget magazine lamenting on how the Galas Motorsports SC entry #12 would have to relinquish their number to Western Speed (Roger Penske backed). Note that Billy Wease ran the #12 this year in Silver Crown competition and Galas Motorsports had to forfeit their long-running #12 and mark it #112.
A similar dispute started when the RE Technologies/Carl Edwards team tried to swipe the #99 from the Mucci-Matczak Seals-It car. The Carl Edwards backed car driven at Homestead in March 2006 did list the #99 on their car, until Mucci Matczak filed a dispute and got their number back. In 2007, the Seals-It #99 ran a majority of the races, so apparently they were allowed to keep the #99. If you look at the Homestead Qualifying Results from 3-25-2006,
http://www.motorsport.com/news/artic...917&FS=USAC-SC, Pete Shepherd is listed as qualifying 4th in the #99 car:
4. Pete Shepherd III, 99, Edwards/RE - 31.429
Take a look at the Springfield qualifying results from 2006 (8-19-06):
http://www.motorsport.com/news/artic...627&FS=USAC-SC
Springfield 2006:
Jeff Swindell qualified 17th in the #12 Galas entry:
17. Jeff Swindell, 12, Galas - 31.106
Then take a look at the Springfield qualifying results from 8-18-07:
http://www.motorsport.com/news/artic...809&FS=USAC-SC
Springfield 2007:
Hud Cone qualified 28th in the #112 Galas entry and Billy Wease qualified in the #12 Western Speed (Roger Penske backed) entry:
17. Billy Wease, 12, Western Speed - 31.479
28. Hud Cone, 112, Galas - 32.371
After looking at the FACTS listed above, it would appear that the new rule about numbers clearly was written to benefit the newest NASCAR-related contingent who are running NEW GEN cars. It is also equally biased against dirt cars. I am sure there are some historians who frequent this message board who can tell us how long the Galas Motorsports #12 has been running dirt champ cars/Silver Crown.
UNINVITED PARTICIPANT