[Chief Wahoo]

So did USAC give Seavey a fine for losing his wheel cover at Lawrenceburg? If not, then they better not fine Hunter Maddox for losing one at Bloomington. Asking for myself.

[Rpracing1]

Originally Posted by Chief Wahoo So did USAC give Seavey a fine for losing his wheel cover at Lawrenceburg? If not, then they better not fine Hunter Maddox for losing one at Bloomington. Asking for myself.

Fine enforcement probably dependent on whether or not Spridge received a Xmas gift from noted drivers last year.

Just thinking out loud here.

[Charles Nungester]

That was his freebee

Should have gotten a 34pt penalty for losing a nose piece in hot laps though.

[Dirtfan]

Originally Posted by Charles Nungester That was his freebee Should have gotten a 34pt penalty for losing a nose piece in hot laps though.

Why,your favorite driver got caught cheating & nothing was done?

[Dirtfan]

Originally Posted by Chief Wahoo So did USAC give Seavey a fine for losing his wheel cover at Lawrenceburg? If not, then they better not fine Hunter Maddox for losing one at Bloomington. Asking for myself.

2024 USAC Rulebook

Section 308

In the I

I'd leave a link,somebody will?

[Chief Wahoo]

Any wheel cover dislodging under racing conditions will be subject to a fine.

Just wanna make sure there’s no preferential treatment

[interpreter66]

Seavey won’t (one of the golden children )Maddox might (not a golden child )

[Daisy's dad]

Originally Posted by Chief Wahoo Any wheel cover dislodging under racing conditions will be subject to a fine. Just wanna make sure there’s no preferential treatment

If that's how it's actually spelled out in the rule book, I think the key phrase is "subject to." In other words, they might or they might not.

[Dirtfan]

Originally Posted by Daisy's dad If that's how it's actually spelled out in the rule book, I think the key phrase is "subject to." In other words, they might or they might not.

Spot on right there.💯👍