openwheelfan1 (Offline)
#52
8/16/09 10:51 PM
I have had the privilege of being around the sport of sprint car and midget racing for over 40 years. The present situation with the sprint car and midget car counts is not something that (in my opinion) can be totally blamed on the current USAC management. The current situation has developed over the course of the last 5-8 years (and many will say longer) and again, IMO will not be solved in 1-2 years.
Certainly, in the midwest there exist enough sprint cars to have 25 to 30 at any pavement race IF some can be persuaded to take off the wings. Some of the winged pavement races cite safety, and some costs for not racing with USAC. I personally do not know what the answer is, but almost certainly containing and controlling costs going forward have to be a part of the solution.
Midgets are (I believe) a different story. Yes, POWRI seems to be somewhat stronger than USAC right now, but their car counts are off some too. The Chili Bowl every year proves that there are LOTS of midgets out there, but IMO midget costs are SO out of control most owners leave their cars in the garage except for one or two events. $35,000 engines that require $5,000+ rebuilds after 6-8 races and racing for $1,500 to win does not make a lot of sense to me.
The economy, fuel prices, lack of exposure, lack of opportunity to advance, and costs are all things that threaten OUR sport. Many on here have said increased purses will solve the car count, but I do not believe it is just purses. I think we have seen this year that bigger purses do not always equate to big car counts. I reference the $5,000 to win event @ TSS that drew 20 cars and the $2,000 to win event @ LPS that drew 40.
The solution (or solutions) has to be something embraced by the fans, the racers, the sanctioning bodies and the promoters. OUR sport is threatened and if WE can work together, WE can save it.
Steve
Vukie (Offline)
#54
8/16/09 11:06 PM
Stafford Springs, CT
Loudon, NH
Myrtle Beach SC
DonMoore10 (Offline)
#56
8/16/09 11:28 PM
Syracuse, NY
Sacramento, CA
Stockton, CA Mile dirt
Fresno, CA Mile dirt
Del Mar, CA (there may be a new surface for this track that wouldn't work)
Beulah Park, Mile dirt Columbus, OH (had an AMA flat track race there Aug.16)
Tulsa State Fairgrounds 3/4 mile dirt, great facility. Not sure if the horses are still running there or not. Yes, I'm well aware of the problems there a few years ago.
racephoto1 (Offline)
#59
8/17/09 12:51 AM
The biggest thing they need is a good PR guy. They can't even get there results posted in the Indy Star, and they're head quartered there. Hell the speedrome has everything listed each time they run,why doesn't USAC ? Somebody really needs to schmooze with the sports editor there.
I went to Stafford for the PRA race, I went to Oswego,I also saw Illiana. Three great shows for Champ Cars. They could even do Oswego and Stafford on the same weekend. New Hampshire would also be nice.
Dirt, Terre Haute back on,I think the Burg would be great, It's wide enough , and big enough. Back to the Grove.
I also remember when we only ran 3 champ shows a year.
Spridge , do some more research you whippersnapper. If you have any old USAC year books , check out what the Hoosier Hundred and Hulman Classic used to pay. Eldora wasn't the first place to pay good money. Heck , I remember when purses paid overages, and Iowa, Oswego , and ORP should have! But that was loooong before your time.
psullivan
#60
8/17/09 7:22 AM
It's great to speculate on all the tracks you would like USAC run - but interest is a two-way street. Those tracks have to be interested in buying the product and convinced they could make a profit - and after that there has to be assurance that the teams will support the event. Several on the lists have come and gone - and they wouldn't be gone if the interest and profitably was present. I have announce two Silver Crown races in my career to a crowd of less than 1,000 (and could have been less than 500 really).