Home | Register | Quick Links | FAQ | Donate | Contact |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
4/13/13, 5:05 PM | #41 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 354 |
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
||
|
4/13/13, 5:43 PM |
#42
Re: Milwaukee gone
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,701 |
POWRI would not touch a Silver Crown series with a 10 foot pole. What do the do well? One surface. Small to medium facilities. Small team friendly. Regional footprint. Any of this sound like what Silver Crown needs?
|
||
|
4/13/13, 7:13 PM |
#43
Re: Milwaukee gone
|
||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 232 |
Quote:
As to what POWRI does do well, hmm well looking at the fact they have only been around since 2005 and have done nothing but grow their National midget series to be bigger then USAC's I would say they are doing pretty near everything pretty damn well. |
||
|
4/13/13, 7:47 PM |
#44
Re: Milwaukee gone
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 1,701 |
Quote:
Lets face it. There is not enough lipstick to put on this pig (Silver Crown races) Getting rid of USAC, going to POWRi, going Outlaw, putting in 410 enginges, putting in ASCS engines, getting NASCAR drivers to race the cars, insert stupid idea here. It does not matter. The series is in the sunset of its life cycle. Once again, if the demand was there, the supply would be there. Having the same 25 people come on this message board and tell us what we are missing is not going to change the future. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
![]() |