Originally Posted by Tq14:
<SNIP> Just interested what we can do to keep our prices of engines down, while keeping the traditional tq? why dont tq series check cc?
Ask Bob Mcclure. I think he only has around $500 in each of his engines. They seem to be very reliable also.
As far as checking the cc's, I'm working on it. I also have an electronic fuel analyzer that will check for ANY additives.

Gonna get REAL interesting next year........
Later,
---------- Post added at 09:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 PM ----------
Originally Posted by suade82:
Hey, do we have Dog Food and Glue yet?
Wade Vest
Naw, I don't think this horse is dead yet.........

---------- Post added at 09:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 PM ----------
Originally Posted by slide22:
why not go to an all 600cc rule. I'm sure the new 600's put out the same/more as those old tq engines... and they're a dime a dozen for less than $1000 on ebay..
The way I see things, the old Honda's have a longer stroke which allows for more compression. Alcohol LOVES compression. More compression leads to more torque. More torque means coming off the corners harder. Coming off the corners harder means faster speeds in the first 3/4 of the straights..... This engine has a lower RPM range than the short-stroked newer motors. It can have an advantage on short tracks and tighter corners.
The newer engines have a shorter stroke, higher RPMs. This engine would be better suited for a larger track where you can keep thr R's up. I have seen these turn RPMs in the 14,000 range where the Hondas are at 11,800or so. The Honda could "Top Out" before the end of the straights, while the newer engines can just keep winding higher, gaining more speed.
With the different size tracks that MTQRL runs on, it comes down to "half dozen of one, six of another". Both have thier uses. Good luck in picking the right engine.
