Originally Posted by SUPERDUKE:
YOU DON'T GET IT! GET RID OF THE 410 HIGH DOLLAR ENGINE THAT YOU RACING FOR $1000 TO $1500 IN IND. AND RACE A ENGINE FOR $5600 A YEAR! NOT TWO CLASS'S ONE COST SAVING CLASS WITH OVER 700 HORSE POWER!:redflag:
I do get it. If I own a current motor, I will now have to find a buyer in a down market. I lose quite a bit of money and now I am stuck with an engine platform that if it breaks, I will have to depend on Chevy to get it back to me before the next race. It won't just cost $5,600 if it breaks. No way Chevy wouldn't have me pay to repair the motor or switch it out. Something I could have fixed myself is now something I have to pay someone else to fix and wait on them to get it back to me.
As far as the Toyota thing, I'm sure they will have motors, but their effect on the local scene will be minimal, just like MoPar. The Indiana deal is self governing and self leveling.
I say that if it is good then let it run as another alternative, but making it mandatory is a bad situation. The reason I said if it was a 410 it would be better is because if they built a 410 motor for about $15,000 that made good horsepower then you could just phase out the other motors and it would self govern.
Everyone keeps saying that we need to get rid of the $40,000 motor. Why not just but it two years from now when it is a $17,000 or 4 years from now when it is a $13-14,000? There are very few guys in Indiana buying new motors every year and even fewer spending
$40,000.
By the way, no tracks in Indiana go strictly by USAC'S rules.