slide22 (Offline)
#31
2/8/09 1:29 AM
violin why are you so againt the new club?
badcoupe (Offline)
#33
2/8/09 2:28 PM
I think if the racers are smart thet will go to the tracks that they like, are closer to their home, or pay the most. As a former car owner in the umra thats what I would do anyhow. I don't think the new club is about alienating a certain team as much as it is taking bias out of the equation.
MKTQ17 (Offline)
#35
2/8/09 3:32 PM
STP
Member
Heat Race Winner
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Racing Capital of the World
Posts: 217 Re: Tate Martz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPM
just a question not pro or anti goff but what would happen when a so called green car pulled into a midwestern tq midget pits. would they not be allowed to race with this league or are all cares that fit the rules allowed to race?
to a real question is it time that the umra reduced the age limit to race to get more cars? I would say that they could get people that run mini sprints , kenyons, and focus cars.
UMRA=
It will be a private club and they will NOT be welcomed.
I don't think even changing the age limit would make a difference for them. There are too many people in running the club that can't see the light of day. We are planning to include drivers 14 and up as long as they are willing to sign a race emmancipation agreement. I want the league to be a transition from karts to sprints. And welcome career members and those wishing to use it as a stepping stone to the next level.
************************************************** ***********
Just a quote that I remembered STP posted when they began their club. This also backs up what violin is saying. "just trying to buy there way in" and backs up what I say "they are not promoting TQ racing" which is fine thay can do what they want and drivers can choose to or not to support them. Just don't advertise your private club like everyone can come and race!
Michael Koontz #17
To be the best you must beat the best!
Sandy Lowe (Offline)
#39
2/8/09 5:07 PM
To everyone who is involved, or has been involved, in three-quarter midget racing and is bickering on IOW and airing all of your dirty laundry in public, you are not helping.
Take your energy, anger, etc. and try to figure out a way to get UMRA and MTQRL to come together and be one strong club instead of two weak ones.
UMRA's average car count last year was 28.64. If you take out the pavement races (which averaged 22) the car count bumps up a little to 30.69. UMRA's highest car count was 35.
The most TQ's competing on any one night was 40. This was when the MTQRL held their first race (17 cars) the same night as UMRA's season closer (23 cars).
You need more people to become involved in three-quarter midget racing as car owners and drivers. Do you think anyone who reads the bickering on IOW is going to buy a TQ and race with either club?
If you want three-quarter midget racing to be successful make positive posts on IOW. Or just not post at all.
If your intentions are to rip apart three-quarter midget racing and have it fail then go right ahead and continue with your negative posts.
Sandy Lowe
TQ29m (Offline)
#40
2/8/09 5:22 PM
Sandy, I want to thank you, for your post, I was thinking of doing the same thing. All this "demolition", by people hiding their identity, only adds to the dark shadow, being cast by their comments, and puts ALL Tq racing in danger. What is currently happening, has been "festering", for at least 10 years. The fact that a new organization has been formed, and has been successful so far, only brings out the need, for a real deep look, into this form of racing. Hiding identity, taking cheap shots, doesn't bring people together, it only makes the whole TQ racing, in general, look bad. Thanks again, Sandy! Bob