Kirk wrote,
Who do you need to see competing for a win? Cottle has gotten his deal. Brady Short is the man. The good ones can compete. Why would you try to make it easier? It shouldn't be easy - it wasn't easy for those guys to get to the point of being competitive with the best guys. If someone can't compete the way it is now, they just need to work harder and get faster. It's so beautiful to see a guy sneak up on the USAC guys and then become a constant contender.
I agree that they could include more guys in the heat races, but there's no need to make it too expansive. Beyond 40 or so cars, there's just no need to keep including cars in the rest of the program. We don't need anybody to cause unneeded cautions or become heat race lapped traffic.
end.
I'll never assume to speak to as why a driver or team isn't competing, Only whats clear to me as a reason. Kevin touched on some of it.
Drivers, like Putterbaugh, Gaines, Briscoe, Petty and a host of others could contend on any given night at any given track if you ask me. What makes a Kings Royal, chili bowl or Knox Nationals events are the F,E,D,C,B mains EVERYBODIES INCLUDED, theres MORE RACING and there is a sence of "SOMETHING'S GOING TO HAPPEN!" even if it doesn't.
Part of the fact of the MSCS big shows that make them EVENTS and I'll includes sprint and midget week in this. WOW, Theres 50-60-70-88! CARS! Not some condensed version of a local show that tosses anything above 32 out to the pasture within 8 laps of qualifications.
These events have six heats of ten cars, Not four. A Dash! 40 lap features that not only award drivers that drive hard but also those who drive smart and give time for someone who started 18th to win.
I seen two regular shows at TC this spring, I seen Cottle, Stinhouse, Levi, Short, Bland, Stanbrough and several other stars all in the same night. Tell me what I need USAC for? other than qualifications, There isn't anything better about it. IMHO.
Lets be honest, USACs broke and lesser known than Dirt Motorsports yet they have TV, Webcast ect Pay a ton more and THEIR BROKE TOO! Not only that, They have one less fan who can't afford their 40+ plus gate prices except for a couple big shows each year.
In order for USAC to get where it needs to go, they need to exploit the PA swing, Get a Mo. Kansas, Iowa swing, Expand the Western fall swing and make em doable for both teams and fans. He did say it right, They are not going to grow running indiana three times a week. They are going to have to take the sucesses and build on them and venture into new markets and create about 10 BIG SHOWS a year as maybe acumilation of these SWINGS. Williams grove ends the PA swing with a 10-20grand finale. Knox finishes the midwest swing with a 15 grand finale ect or better yet, A knox non wing nationals with a format simular to the winged version.
Id love to see tracks put up multi day shows, However the drawbacks to them are seeing top teams in some instances race less.
Another thing is, How do you get tracks to take risk?????????? To do any of what his vision is, You have to convince them it will and can work. Some of these things would take several years of building it into a EVENT that actually turns a profit.
You have to go out and get the sponsorships (And Kevin touched on this) that not only sponsor but market as well.
As for Greg, Im still gonna support him, he's got contacts, ambiton and full knowledge of the sport inside and out. Thats something to hold onto, Get advice from and work with. Vision?????? The man told me in 1988 when winged racing was HUGE in Indiana and that even USAC had to dawn em to gain interest, That in under ten years it will be OVER, He told me exactly why and thats EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED! You need the need the insight and knowledge of what can and cannot be done and someone who can and will work to make it happen. As for a racers, fans and promotors. There is nobody who knows it better.
As for USAC, They are just flat going to have to run or try to run shows they schedule and promote. Not have people taking vacations ect and phantom rain it out or THREAT OF RAIN. Whats the point in planing to attend a event that won't or most likely won't be run?
In Closing, This back marker crap is just that IMHO, True some teams have tons of money or sponsorhips or both that don't wanna race against them but chances are, They STARTED THAT WAY and had some old heads saying the same thing about them at one point.
Chuck, saying the top racers will make the fields. not just the top dollar teams.
Charles Nungester