bigmojo5
#21
4/9/08 8:50 PM
If that's how you read the article, then it must not be the same one that is linked to this thread.
Though not specifically stated in the comments chosen by the writer to include in his story (or that editors may have deleted), Fike does indicate remorse for endangering fellow drivers with his comments that the NASCAR drug policy of "reasonable suspicion" did not prevent him from racing. Had the policy prevented his racing, he would not have put other driver's lives in danger.
And, is it arrogant to say that his ability to race while on a significant dangerous drug proves that "reasonable suspicion" doesn't work, or merely a statement of fact?
Jim Morrison
Anderson36 (Offline)
#23
4/9/08 11:07 PM
Mr. Morrison,
with all do respect, his statement of being able to race while on this significant illegal drug and get away with it seems to be awefully arrogant.
It seems to me that his statements are more along the lines of "Yes, I was on an illegal drug while participating and I got away with it. Maybe NASCAR should review their policies and procedures so next time they could prevent it from happening"
This would be my interpretation of the past articles that have been published.
racefan20 (Offline)
#25
4/9/08 11:25 PM
Dean I was a big fan too. In fact the story of the day I got to meet him is one I will never forget. He was one of a kind. Its a crime that his name has been forever besmirched by NASCAR
John Hoover
“To whom little is not enough, nothing is enough.” Epicurus
LEADERS EDGE (Offline)
#27
4/10/08 10:47 AM
I think Tim Richmond was a one of a kind. I never met him, but he had that type of personality that people liked. He was also a fun driver to watch race.
That said, by most accounts,Tim was very reckless in many ways and while he was never known to use drugs on a race morning, he did use. Tim chose to live his life that way and unfortunately he paid an incrediable price for those choices. If Aaron is lucky, he will not pay that same type of price.
As far as Aaron goes though, who knows? Only he knows where he is at and at the end of the day it is very hard to trust an addict of any sort with telling the truth.(Even those addicted racing itself). I don't know him at all really, so I can't really judge him. If he doesn't have the humilty to hold himself accoutable and realize his actions, there is a good chance he could slip again.
I think for people who don't use(like me) or have never been around it, you almost have this cartoonish idea of what drugs do to people(Like the movie Reefer Madness). Almost as if a junkie is some sort of Zombie like creature.Obviously it isn't always like that and it is often hard to tell if someone is using. Especially when they get to the point where they act most normal when they are high oppossed to when they are straight.
One of the problems when discussing this subject is when we get to splitting hairs. One illegal drug is alright and another isn't. When the USAC policy was put in place, the group of people who don't believe pot is wrong to do, where afraid that they or their friends would be affected by the new policy. While another group of people feel that they should test and ban users of all drugs.
So the problem becomes, what if Shane Hmiel or Fike are not caught doing anything more than pot? Should they get the same courtesy as the others and not pay a penalty or since they were offenders of other drug situations in the past, should they pay a heavy penalty?
My opinion is that if it's illegal according to the govt. then it's illegal. No gray area. Any other way then it just becomes a moral judgement or at the very least a popularity contest. Besides:If all you want to do is race and pot isn't addictive, it shouldn't be a hard CHOICE then. Right?
Does this mean I believe they shouldn't get another chance? No. If they have paid whatever penalty given to them, who am I to impose any further judgement. You break the rules, you pay the price and move on.
Beer Goggles (Offline)
#28
4/10/08 11:06 AM
I tend to be a hardliner when it comes to illegal drugs. Since the legal system gave him a pass, that does not mean USAC has to pat him on the head and condone his behavior.
He should sit out a minimum of one year, especially in light of his admission to using during a NASCAR race.
His example is just another reason for young drivers to think they can experiment with drugs, and then boast that they won't suffer any real consequeces down the line.
The kids are laughing behind our backs.
Brolzy (Offline)
#29
4/10/08 2:01 PM
Remorse is a touchy thing, and I think that people show it differently. I think that he wants to help change things, like he says he does, in his way that's his remorse; making a positive out of a negative. I hope all of his plans come to fruitition and are successful.
LocalYokel (Offline)
#30
4/10/08 3:48 PM
Originally Posted by Beer Goggles:
I tend to be a hardliner when it comes to illegal drugs. Since the legal system gave him a pass, that does not mean USAC has to pat him on the head and condone his behavior.
He should sit out a minimum of one year, especially in light of his admission to using during a NASCAR race.
His example is just another reason for young drivers to think they can experiment with drugs, and then boast that they won't suffer any real consequeces down the line.
The kids are laughing behind our backs.
Says the man calling himself "Beer Goggles"...:rolleyes:
You better take care of me, Lord. If you don't you're gonna have me on your hands.