Originally Posted by JShock66:
You proved my point exactly...
You remember when NASCAR ran the Hoosiers? The tires decided everything in a lot of races. Chassis, shocks, oil, wheel, bars, driver, etc. ... non of that mattered. Have the right tires and you fun up front ... you don't think that would get people complaining?
As far as the Focus/Kenyons being created to be more affordable ... well, I would have to say that experiment has failed to this point. I saw several races that had less than 10 cars. Why is that? If cost was the bottom line, that division should be taking off.
I agree 100% with the lack of promotion ... but even if we had 5x the people in the stands, that still would not affect the cost of having a race team. If anything, it would bring even more money into the sport and the cost would go even higher.
The Chili Bowl was just one of the barometers I used to say the sport is still healthy ... if the count would have been down this year, I'm sure Don and some other people would be proclaiming the death of midget racing. You can't have it both ways.
I would like to see the numbers out there as far as tire contracts go ... from NASCAR down. I know we all remember the great showing in Indy by F1 a few years back ... what a great show that tire war put on.
Yeah I remember the NASCAR/GoodYear/Hoosier fiasco. They are pretty lucky they didn't kill someone. The problem there, I'm sure you recall, was NASCAR dropping the ball...i.e. testing the product. Each week the tire companies showed up, threw on the latest, greatest tires and turned them loose.
As I'm sure you also know, Hoosier is very successful in ARCA. Proper testing would make competing tires a non issue.
The whole point is this. If chassis company 123 pays X amount of dollars into a clubs year end point fund, then demands everyone has to use their chassis....how would that go over? Or a shock company? What if my sponsor is Valvoline but Pennzoil is the series sponsor? I'm forced to use Pennzoil? Bottom line, it's wrong, nuf said.
[I]"
As far as the Focus/Kenyons being created to be more affordable ... well, I would have to say that experiment has failed to this point. I saw several races that had less than 10 cars. Why is that? If cost was the bottom line, that division should be taking off."[/I]
You're right, that experiment has failed. Why is that? Well, it's common knowledge that Focus midgets are now, damn near as expensive as a full midget. That's why you will continue to see less than 10 cars. This season it will be 5. Next year they will be gone. It started off as a good idea, but...well...I should just leave it at that.
[I]
I agree 100% with the lack of promotion ... but even if we had 5x the people in the stands, that still would not affect the cost of having a race team. If anything, it would bring even more money into the sport and the cost would go even higher.[/I]
I'm not really sure what you mean. Not being a butthead, I honestly don't know what you mean. If more fans in the stands creates more money into a series, and the organization continues to enforce the rules and control costs, how would it cost more to run the team?
David.