Dad, that wouldn't be a very equal arrangement, as we have an 836cc engine limit, on SOHC, and 700cc on twin cam, multivalve, it would be like taking a knife to a gun fight. If you're refering to Davis&Peck, I think they are both gone, along with Casale/ Cornis, they are all gone as far as I know, I know for sure Cornis is, I last talked to him, maybe early to mid 90's, and he passed not long after, I bought a lot of parts off him, almost bought his remaining stock, but relatives came into play, and thought they'd all become millionairs of what he had left them. I think Gary Schroeder took a look, as well as at the stock of Norden, but walked away. I don't have any say in who runs with us, but who knows, what the answer might be, I'd say only in conjunction with, not against each other. Acro makes a small rear end, and a lot of us run a full midget rear end. This thing could easily get out of hand, but personally, I think it is better left alone, it is about as traditional as it gets, if someone wants to invent another variation, have at it. Bob!
![Smile](https://www.indianaopenwheel.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
---------- Post added at 11
AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 AM ----------
Originally Posted by Cincy Dirt Bowl:
What I built is not the point. I said if ya want bigger car counts add 600 mini sprints. I understand more than anybody that Indiana TQs don't have transmissions or chain drives as the rule book states. I learned that rule is here to stay the hard way, but that still doesn't mean it is right or the best thing for TQs. If you had come to more races this year you would already know there are people tring again to get that set up made legal. So get ready for that can of worms to open back up. Not by me though, I want nothing to do with that mess. Like I said, been there, done that.
.
BTW, Chris Economaki called me an entertaining anouncer in Nat. Speed Sport News.
I always had a lot of respect, for Chris, can't believe he'd be that far off! As far as leaving the trans on the engine, and running off the crankshaft end, as the rules spell out, that's fine with me, that isn't new, it just required some changes to a current chassis, and evidently wasn't considered, worth the effort, but, you do what you see fit, but don't expect a lot of followers. Bob!
![Smile](https://www.indianaopenwheel.com/images/smilies/smile.gif)
---------- Post added at 11:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:08 AM ----------
Originally Posted by DAD:
Speaking of quick change rear end do any of you ancient guys know how to get in touch with Eddie Davis his dad made the first TQ quick changes back in the 50,s. We could probably find a couple of 1000 cc mini sprints to race with you if you want.
---------- Post added at 11:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:44 AM ----------
Mr Ambrose they probably couldn't out law the driver so they just outlawed his car. You probably won too many races. I hear you were using some sort of traction control.
DAD, I think it was more the 2-smoke engine, rather than the chain drive, because I had the last car that had had a Konig in it, and it had been converted to a QC Cornis rear end, the imprint of the Konig engine is still on the old motorplate, which I still have, and, true to common sense, no one even considered the driver in the equation, which had more to do with it than anything, he still kept spankin their asses, after they went to a Honda! Bob!:2: