Motormasher (Offline)
#22
1/30/09 11:32 AM
MSCS is becoming (or is) a much better series than USAC. They pay better, don't travel and have no engine rules.
Sure they don't run a 10 month schedule but who can afford to run one?
USAC does have a awesome reputation for putting on the best shows on dirt and pavement all over the country but how many "regular teams" that aren't financed by millionaires actually can run the whole series on what they earn in winnings like they used to back in 60's & 70's. Now you have to have a pavement car and a dirt car with compatible engines for both.
I know this is the same problem we have at all levels of racing but I don't think that by paying more money to the winner is the answer like the new director of USAC is proposing, at least thats what I have heard his answer to the problem is.
winged and non-winged (Offline)
#24
1/30/09 11:49 AM
Shortbus is absolutely correct! Some of you probably didn't realize it , or probably forgot about it... Clayton raced for three or four years with the wing in Missouri. He was lightning fast with the wing back then as a youngster. I have seen him many times with the tin top. I'm sure he will be as fast as ever.
Shawn (Offline)
#25
1/30/09 1:18 PM
Beat me to it...
It's not a big surprise, really. After all, Clayton raced with a wing before coming to USAC...
6565 (Offline)
#28
1/30/09 3:36 PM
Man, you opened a can of worms now! This is the wrong board to imply that the term "sprint car" means with wings. I think to most people on here, there are sprint cars, and then there are winged sprint cars. Prepare for a tongue-lashing!