That's a great question. With the advent of streaming, it's an interesting question but one that probably can't be answered.
A) How many paying fans are tracks losing folks choose to just stay home and watch or watch the replay?
B) How many new fans and future on track site paying fans is streaming creating because of new visibility?
Personally, I don't believe streaming is a major factor in local tracks closing. A factor, perhaps, but not the major. Society changes is a factor. Folks just have a lot more options, things to do on a weekend night.
but for me, I believe the biggest issue is track management and poorly ran shows. Look at Kenny Dobson in Jacksonville, Il. Dude is a killer promoter. He communicates extremely well with his fans, runs a tightly ran show with not 5+ divisions running. And gets fans out by a decent reasonable hour. Now of course there are nights when things happen outside of a promoters control - weather, bad accidents, etc.
But how many times have you been to a show and watched families pick up their lil kids around 11p or after and have to leave before the promoted feature race hits the track? I've seen it countless times. The track 2,3 local division features BEFORE the promoted (let's say) the $5k to win sprint feature. Then they take "brief intermission" and end up starting the sprint feature a lil before midnight.
Dobson (Jacksonville) doesn't do that and they are doing open and doing well. Yet, I could list by name the number of tracks who did run their shows that way and they are no longer around.
Flo may be an issue. Hard to know without facts about the money. But poorly ran shows hurts more IMO
Originally Posted by brown11b:
I get tired of this argument.
The tracks don't close because of Flo and DV.
Lets take a look here in Indiana at our own case study, Gas City, since it is the latest track to fade away. The only time Gas City was on Flo was when USAC came to town. Stands, pits, and parking lots were full during those shows.
Tracks need to look at streaming as an opportunity. If every time a national series comes to town and a good show is put on then maybe a few extra people may show up to a weekly show to come check the track out in person. Or maybe they will come to the next national series show in person because the last program was exciting.
I am at the track every weekend possible. When I can't be at the track, I like to watch USAC on Flo and occasionally High Limit. Some times I am at the track and still watch USAC at another track on my phone from the pits when I can.
I also will occasionally watch NARC stuff when I am up too late. That isn't robbing the track of a paying fan, because I am not in California, but if I do make it out there and have a free night and am close enough to a track I might check out a NARC show because I have seen the tracks and am familiar with some of the cars/drivers because of Flo.
Justin Fiedler of Dirtrackr has discussed this off and on the past few years.
"People have three options when it comes to consuming dirt racing. They can either go to the track, they can watch it online, or they can do nothing. If for whatever reason they first option doesn't happen, either through distance, cost, or anything else - if you give track and series people the choice would you rather those fans not at the track watched online or didn't consume the sport at all? To me the answer seems pretty clear; I'd rather they were doing absolutely anything to be involved versus nothing at all."
I've included a link to the video so you can watch his discussion further.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOtO...nnel=DIRTRACKR