Originally Posted by Jerry Spencer:
So if one side rolls out a little smaller as you say how are you going to get the stagger you want and or need without changing something??
We do have tires we planned on using to start the season at our local tracks, if they do not go with these rules we should be ok as we only run a handfull of U.S.A.C. shows.
It is my opinion that this is going to cost racers money one way or another it is also my opinion that rules are not there to help low budget teams, just my opinion and as I have been told before what do I know.
Jerry
As a fan who pays $$$ to watch our sport, I have been following this thread. Let me see if I have this right:
If USAC goes to a spec 16" RR tire in 2014, why are they doing that? To cut costs for their competitors? The spec tire, bought in abundance, will lower the price for all? And, in theory, it will level the playing field and probably be easier to police in the tech inspection. Sounds like a good idea. Especially if you only ran USAC events.
BUT, the tracks in and around the area with a weekly sprint show have a more lenient RR tire rule, wherein a 17" or 18" RR tire would be a better ticket than a smaller 16" RR tire. So, all teams with 16" RR tires would use them only in the USAC sanctioned races.
If most teams have been running the larger tires, if USAC changes their tire rule for 2014, to run USAC races they would now need to stock up on 16" wheels. The subject of the debate is the cost of the wheels moreso than the cost of the 16" spec tires?
What is the average price of a top shelf wheel and just for my own notes, how many RR wheels did you guys go through this past season, Jerry? You guys ran weekly this past year. Anyone else who also runs weekly, please chime in for that matter. I am just trying to get my head around how much you guys spend on that one specific item annually - RR wheels.