Hubie (Offline)
#11
8/1/11 11:30 AM
It's a shame that it only took this fat tub of Goo seventeen years to figure it out.
Hotshoe65s (Offline)
#13
8/1/11 1:00 PM
I would like to treat this idiot to a weekend of real racing. I think Bloomington, putnamville, and konkomo would change his opinion of what dirt track racing is. I think all the heat from the asphalt has went to his head. As for indy, it's prestige has been long gone, not due to NASCAR or any other race series, but because to be honest it's a boring place to watch a race. And the racing itself is never very good.
Posted using Mobile Device
Dick Monahan (Offline)
#15
8/1/11 1:45 PM
Folks, Ed Hinton is a sprint car fan. I don't know how many traditional sprint races he's seen, but many years ago, when he was at The National Sports Daily, at my suggestion, he covered the Knoxville Nationals, and wrote a great story for The National.
Torry (Offline)
#16
8/1/11 2:37 PM
I guess Mr. Hinton forgot about the Whittington brothers and Mrs. Hulman's concern for all the flowerbeds when he wrote the article. ...and the loss of the true Snake Pit.
Let's be realistic: the glamor of the Speedway was all about the event and not just the race.
Posted using Mobile Device
illiNOISE (Offline)
#17
8/1/11 3:52 PM
If you want a truer barometer of Indy Car's erosion, just look at all the empty seats at Milwaukee for this year's race at the Mile. Or the 0.8 rating that race got on ABC. Or note that last weekend, Formula 1, a circuit with zero American drivers and no US races--at least not this year--had the German Gran Prix on Fox, while the Indy race from Edmonton was on obscure cable network Versus.
Posted via Mobile Device