hairracer44 (Offline)
#11
4/1/10 12:05 AM
The reality of it is that USAC is trying to strong arm their drivers and car owners into not running anywhere else but USAC. Sound like a mafia type move. Not only do you pay a large membership fee but now they are going to tell you were you can race WOW.
cshuman (Offline)
#16
4/1/10 12:31 AM
Its USAC, and just like ALOT of decisions they make, it kinda dumb, and it doesnt really benefit anyone... It is only trying to keep guys from running a series that USAC feels a little heat from. More people are passing on USAC events, and going to run with other clubs, Powri, ASCS, MSCS, KISS, heck even local shows. Its a pretty safe bet North Vernon will have more cars then Eldora, just like last year when USAC was at Brownstown, there were more cars running at North Vernon some 30 miles away for half the money. Why?? Just my opinion, but I think USAC would be better off listening to its members, having votes on important issues, and trying to do what they can to make competitors WANT to be at their events... Now that Im sure this post will be followed by some glares at the next USAC event, I will shhhhh..
6 Likes:
IndyBound, JEFFSTOY, Pat O'Connor Fan, racephoto1, SpfldMile, tamati
kylenap@yahoo.com (Offline)
#17
4/1/10 12:34 AM
If they are going to have this rule they should schedule a lot more races. I believe this rule is aimed at the guys like Coons, Darland, and Clausen that run all three divisions. Maybe, I don't know. There's always a big deal about the WoO and their similar rule but they have 80+ races that pay 10,000 and up.
Dyno Don (Offline)
#20
4/1/10 7:15 AM
Doesn't The WoO have a rule like this also?