Originally Posted by CAJ:
I have no doubt Gregg will certainly make a note of how you would like to see 2008 ISW series formated!
Me personaly, if it ain't broke don't "try" and fix it! Last years format was just fine and I saw some of the best racing in the U.S. just the way it was!
:headbang: :angry-smiley-007:
What I saw wasn't bad, But a normal show with 6 heats, Two consis and 40 cars running at least two races each beats it IMHO
Over
50 cars, Four heats and 18 of them load up after a 8 lap LCQ.
Im Just saying Midget week had 50 car average. 5-6 heats at each show, Two consi's and some hellacious racing going on in the heats They didn't stop at 3rd because many times, THIRD WASN'T GOOD ENOUGH. If its guaranteed a top 4 make the A. There is no extra incentive for someone running in a locked in possition to move forward.
I understand USAC's format. Its for their Series racers. At a normal USAC show this works fairly well (32 Locked) Because mainly not many *Outside teams* attempt them anyway.
Could you imagin\g Sprint Week with 100 car following and nothing else on the card? make the format where everyone has a chance and I believe it's possible.
I'll go to some SW shows but like I said after this years. IT COULD BE BETTER and after MW shows, that showed me HOW MUCH BETTER IT COULD BE! :thumb::thumb:
I know Greg reads these boards sometimes, The mans a standup guy and will give you reasons in person or in a official capcity. He's honest and tells it like it is. He also knows I tell it like I see it and praise when praise is due. BTW Greg, Thanks for working hard on getting some stuff hammered out for next year so early. It's easier to make plans for
Chuck, Tentativily planning on doing the PA tour and all of Midget week.