Originally Posted by harry jones:
who ever posted this had better have their head checked, do you think Bill May will give up mmsa. not on your life. to bad he won't go over and work with the amsa. think of the great car count 1 association would have, but, what association would it be? the amsa has been around for years. and everyone and the promoters all know that name. mmsa has been around just a few years. and beginning to make a name for itself. wonder why none of the mmsa guys don't race with the amsa when they don't have a race. Mr Tague don't mind his members racing with mmsa when he don't have a race. but there has to be a reason for that. (maybe they was told not to run with amsa) just my say so, will get alot of flunk about that statement
Harry, just because you have been around for years doesn't mean you are any better than the guy who just set up shop.
We have run with Bill and the MMSA and he does a great job. I can tell you right now that next season there is a strong likelihood we will run wherever we decide we want to run no matter who is running the show.
I agree with what others have posted....let the MMSA have their Indiana tracks, the AMSA L-Burg and other misc Ohio tracks, but then have the two organizations run some joint races at locations that could be agreed to. It would be awesome to see some events that had 30+ cars.
Would also like to see Twin Cities back on the schedule. That would be a great venue for a joint event, as would L-Burg, Brownstown and Waynesfield.
---------- Post added at 09:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:51 PM ----------
Originally Posted by minispeed:
How nice would that be.....40 plus cars at every track. Means bigger purse, more tracks. We would have the upper hand. I am asking bill and jerry to think about it....please for the drivers and the sport.
By the way...excellent job of stirring things up!