Home | Register | Quick Links | FAQ | Donate | Contact |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
3/25/08, 10:06 AM |
#11
Re: USAC and TV
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,136 |
Quote:
If the Outlaws give you such a big woody, then why don't you go to one of their message boards where people share your excitement for them? |
||
|
3/25/08, 10:21 AM |
#12
Re: USAC and TV
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,175 |
Quite interesting going through this post after I just finished reading the article in Sprint Car and Midget about the old Thunder Series.
|
|
|
3/25/08, 10:34 AM |
#13
Re: USAC and TV
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 547 |
Kevin Miller is way too busy fixing the Silver Crown Series(old car vs. new car) to worry too much about TV....right?
|
|
|
3/25/08, 11:34 AM |
#14
Re: USAC and TV
|
||
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 47 |
Quote:
I believe the aussie makes a good point in the differences between WOO and USAC - and those differences are probably some of the reasons why wingless cars may not pull the quality of sponsorship as their winged cousin - I would imagine that if winged sprints didnt look like some freak on dirt, and its popularity was based purely on the quality of the racing, we'd be seeing more USAC on the tube. |
||
|
3/25/08, 12:00 PM |
#15
Re: USAC and TV
|
||
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Boston kinda touched on this, but you say it's all about the money, NOT any of the things that aussie said, correct? Well, why is WoO able to pay the money to be on TV and USAC isn't? Seems to me that maybe some of the things that aussie mentioned come in to play, whether it is in relation to raising the money to pay for airtime, or if it translates directly to being provided with free airtime........... |
||
|
3/25/08, 12:03 PM |
#16
Re: USAC and TV
|
|
Senior Member
Race Count This Year: 24 Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,131 |
This idea that 'VS' don't have viewers is crap.It's in Millions of house holds if you have direct tv turn to channel 603:angry-smiley-007:
|
|
|
3/25/08, 1:06 PM |
#17
Re: USAC and TV
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,136 |
Quote:
|
||
|
3/25/08, 1:21 PM |
#18
Re: USAC and TV
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
Interesting......... All I ever hear about is that the parent company is losing millions and is gonna be filing for bankruptcy any day now.
I re-read both my original post, and also where you quoted it, and I don't see where I made ANY references to the quality of the product (racing or program). |
|
|
3/25/08, 4:15 PM |
#19
Re: USAC and TV
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,136 |
Quote:
I'll say it again - It's about money. There is no such thing as free TV. Somebody has to pay for air time. And when all is said and done, it's the consumer - you and me - that really pays for it. FYI - World Racing Group is still trading at 29 cents per share - not too stout. http://investing.businessweek.com/re...?capId=6654807 |
||
|
3/25/08, 4:30 PM |
#20
Re: USAC and TV
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 179 |
Gentlemen Gentlemen... its nice to hear such pleasant things about our beloved sport.
Just to clarify... Thursday night Thunder was paid for by ESPN... not by USAC. I believe the WoO spent about $2.5 million (rumored) to be on TV last year. As someone said... if we (USAC) had $2.5 million to spend on TV... would we do it... YOU THINK?? Bottom line is that TV cost lots of money no matter who pays for it. Versus Channel is a Tier 1 Cable station as is SPEED. Each goes into the same households. If you think you don't have it... you probably still do. Call your cable provider to find out. All VS. is, is the old OLN channel. For more info on the USAC TV Broadcasts on VS. please visit www.motorsportshour.com rk |
|
|
![]() |