Originally Posted by okokok:
Are you saying that the track is not very racy???
Lawrenceburg is a great new facility -- but, it has not shown great racing - has not shown any great speed.
I wonder if they got the banking set wrong?? Is the clay wrong? Something is missing..
great place to go for a race, yet, a heat that starts and ends with no movement -- this is not good!!!
It was racy as hell weds night. Two and three wide all over the place with cars running side by side for several laps at a time.
Wed the track was good, however there was no way to hang it out and get a advantage as the bottom was just as fast as the top.
I call this too fast a track and it looks like a outlaw show.
Its going to take a bit of trial and error to get this track to come in mulit grooved. They nailed it weds and nobody could complain about rubber or dust last night but it just looked like a line of cars. Stanbrough moved thru the pack but very little movement in the top five the whole race.
If Weds race had stayed green, We would have possibly seen Cottle win from 18th.
I heard people complain weds night about the track taking rubber but IMHO that was a perfect track as it came in as two groves that you could get traction on top or under either. Bloomington does this when it's right.
Thurs id say the track was Haubstadt like prepared. Tacky top to bottom. It didn't work well. It was fast but it was like everyone was on a rail.
No complaints at all from me. It was a hugely successful two nights of racing. I heard possitive comments all night weds even "That was the best damn racing I've seen in years" from a few including me.
Glad to meet several IOW people and the ones I had before. Was nice meeting Pine, Zman and too many to mention.
Congrats to Bland and Short. I wonder if Don Short has any complaints

? Still, Congrats!
Chuck