Home | Register | Quick Links | FAQ | Donate | Contact |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
8/8/09, 3:11 PM |
#91
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
||
Posts: n/a
|
[QUOTE=Tim;125414]
Quote:
John Gurley Have been active in the sport since 1972. My earliest memory. Peggy Carmichael Long time in the racing bizz Bill Shipman Long time in the bizz and is with the MSCS group (Rac'n) Jason Adams He is with the MSCS group and is going to help Sunday Jimmy Jeep Push truucks has confirmed his help. BoB Ramey a regular SCORA Official So I hope this answeres your question and if you change your mind and show up there is our staff. ![]()
_________________________________________________
Last edited by john3g; 8/8/09 at 3:24 PM. |
||
|
8/8/09, 3:17 PM | #92 | |
Senior Member
Race Count This Year: 54 Race Count Last Year: 37 Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 2,925 |
cant wait steak at the boat racing at chandler woooooo hoooo
|
|
|
8/8/09, 3:24 PM |
#93
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
||
|
8/8/09, 3:24 PM |
#94
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 266 |
Quote:
Mr. Sullivan, We knew what we were getting in for when we started coming up here in 2003. We know we would be racing against aluminum motors, and we accepted that we'd be under powered and over weight. When Mr. Stockon had the steel block series, through MSCS, in 2004, we supported it whole-heartedly, both finishing in the top five in points. Interestingly enough, there didn't seem to be a car count problem then, but many of the races were in Illinois where there was a contingent of cars. Jump to 2009, and a new program begins, which puts us back into a field we feel we can compete for wins in. The powers that be indicated that they understood 2009 would be a building year, but were committed to making the series work, even just a few days prior to the "big announcement". The committment was then "altered" to the dismay of many. My only questions on this subject had to do with whether the decisions had been supported by the Race Day Director, Joe Chambers, which, sadly, we now know they were not and Joe is no longer involved with the series. You know, you can only be betrayed by those you put your trust in. We stated from the beginning that we'd support whan we could. Whether they feel betrayed by us is up to them to comment on. We don't feel betrayed by them because, quite frankly, we're not virgins with this series-building process, so we throttled our trust in the folks in charge of the series. The throttle was probably just shut, however, with the recent post by Mr. Chambers. All in all, Kind of a Bummer Tim Simmons |
||
|
8/8/09, 3:43 PM |
#95
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
||
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8/8/09, 3:46 PM |
#96
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
||
Senior Member
Race Count Last Year: 59 Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 5,094 |
Quote:
I have been following this thread and have some questions. I have "no dog in this fight" so the decisions won't affect me one way or the other. Starting in the beginning, I thought this was a great idea and it could give some lower budget racers an opportunity to race in a series. In looking at the original schedule, I was kind of amazed that they would try to make this work travel wise. I still feel this concept has merit but here are some questions for you or anyone else who might care to elaborate. 1)Are there enough steel block sprint cars out there today to adequately supply this type of racing? 2)If you had a three year plan, would you attract enough modified drivers, street stock drivers, etc. to jump on board and increase the number of cars available? 3)I commented earlier that if you had a couple of tracks be the cornerstone for the series, would that help with reduced travel...higher car count? I mentioned maybe contacting Joe Spiker and seeing about running Lincoln Park & Danville once each month from April to September. That would be a 12 race schedule and maybe fill in a few more dates elsewhere. Would that work? 4)In your opinion, what does it now take to make this "idea" continue and flourish in the future? I am not trying to bash anyone and from a spectators point would like some drivers, fans, sponsors, officials, opinions. I realize that "weekend warriors" have regular jobs and sometimes it isn't feasible to make the races every time. If cars get torn up it sometimes takes a little while to get them fixed and back at the track.
__________________
Mike
Be nice to people on the way up. You might need them on the way down. Jimmy Durante
_________________________________________________
Last edited by Mud Packer; 8/8/09 at 4:04 PM. |
||
|
8/8/09, 4:43 PM |
#97
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
Tim,
I have no idea really what the conversations were then and now - I'm just not sure it can work - I'm certain you know this a lot better than I do. My original question was really how much cheaper is the steel block over the aluminum block in the long run. As near as I can tell the answer was not a whole lot. If I am correct (and I do realize the competitive advantages issues in terms of weight) then in order for this to work you either have to have (a) numbers on the supply side or (b) there are other rules issues that keep costs low for everyone and makes it affordable. I'm totally ignorant on both points. I can only ASSUME that the decision to change the rules for this race is related to (a) above - i.e. a lack of numbers. So if the series was to continue on a steel block platform there must be an increase in numbers other changes to rules (such as weight rules) to level the playing field. To be honest, why I am interested is that at all forms of racing a balance has to be struck at some level between cost, speed, and competition. This is true at every level (see the BCRA post) and this is an issue that is sure to come to the fore given the issue of car counts at major midget races like Belleville. These issues are always tough - I announced an IRL pro series race at Milwaukee and we had like 11 or 12 cars and stacked four up on the first turn of the first lap - I thought "this series is doomed", But low and behold it really grew numbers wise and became viable. I completely understand how a series like this would appeal to a lot of people who love to race and want to feel as if they can be competitive.
_________________________________________________
Last edited by psullivan; 8/8/09 at 4:44 PM. |
|
|
8/8/09, 6:21 PM |
#98
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 70 |
John, Please understand that we fully intend to be at Charleston next weekend. There have been a lot of delays for us this year in getting the car ready and it has been a scramble this week trying to get ready. Some things did not come together as we had hoped. We were still going to race knowing that the car would not be correct (fuel injection) just to be making laps. As of right now we have not yet heard this engine run. With the present uncertainty we decided it would be best for us to wait until next weekend with everything dialed in properly. I hope the show goes well and we will see you next weekend.
Dan Chady |
|
|
8/8/09, 6:28 PM |
#99
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
||
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
||
|
8/8/09, 8:17 PM |
#100
Re: Scora opens engine rules
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 980 |
I don't understand what kind of test you think this is gonna prove?
Open race paying $600 to win. What are we going to get from these last few races? Next week is a Saturday race with 4 other tracks running. ![]() ?????????????????????????????????????????????????: 15: |
|
|
![]() |