Originally Posted by Unlucky#9:
What if, instead of increasing the cubic inches, they increased the volumetric efficiency of the production based engines via turbo/supercharging?
I wasn't going to do this, and I know I'll get burned, but my feelings on the D2 midget, is first of, come up with a better name, do kinda what Montpelier is doing, and make it a kinda run what you brung class, as long as it is an engine out of a production passenger car, 4 cyl, stock block, no bigger than 2.5l, no bigger than .030 over, stock stroke, but allow rods, pistons, valves, springs, cams, port work, mostly what a guy can do on his own, no race based engines, possibly the older ones, but I've done some research on this, and I've built a 2.0 for less, a lot less than 5k, which is in the ball park for a good, competitive midget engine, IMHO. Plus, look a bit closer at the pay out, get it at least as much as the Tq's and mini's pay, when I was a lot younger, a long time ago, midgets were all the rage, because they provided the entertainment that people were looking for, they were a lot less costly than most other forms, and a good team could stuff some $$ in their pocket for an evening of fun, I don't see how owners can justify the cost of the National engines, plus the costs of the cars, it simply doesn't calculate for me, and evidently many others. I think in the hands of the right people, this could happen, I never did like "stock" classes, have you ever had to tech a "stock" engine, it isn't pleasant. Make it easy, or KISS if you want, and you might just get surprised. Just my thoughts.