shelloil23 (Offline)
#1
6/12/17 2:41 PM
Currently running a non-wing restricted 360 (carb). We have been pretty successful when there is some bite to the track, but have struggled with side bite when it slicks off. Lately I have noticed more of the manufactures stating a specific engine size with their recommended setups (410/360/305, etc.) and it has really got me to thinking about how the weight is getting transferred in a lower powered car (500hp). We have raised the front to help transfer weight to the rear, and are running softer rear bars than rec, but I'm really starting to confuse myself with how much I should vary from those rec 410 settings (seems like they soften everything up with less power to help with transfer). Thinking maybe raising the car a little? RR shock changes (softer than a 5/6)? RF bar change (softer)...what do you guys think?
Car is an 87/40 Maxim Raised Rail
chastaj (Offline)
#4
6/30/17 8:27 AM
5/1 or 5/2 front shocks. 1050 RF bar (help load LR) drop Jacobs ladder to bottom hole, reduce RR air pressure. Just some direction
2 Likes:
badcoupe, flatout
badcoupe (Offline)
#5
6/30/17 12:06 PM
Raise ride height some plus the above suggestions. Read hyper racing's re-think dirt paper, a technical read but very informative
shelloil23 (Offline)
#8
7/8/17 1:06 AM
Thanks for the responses guys. Got a couple PM's that came through and will definitely reach out to those guy's to talk shop.
I understand what you are saying about keeping notes and learning, trust me we do that as much as we possibly can. But we are a small team looking to improve, and this was more of a "thinking out loud" question to everyone about how these cars react to lower horsepower levels. The manufactures sites rec settings are great, but are all geared towards 410 cars.
We are mainly fighting a loose off condition. Running 1.000 bars everywhere except RF (have been running 1.050 there, switching to 1.025 for tomorrow night to help speed up transfer to LR). Have done the usual easy ups in the front (5/3 and 5/2), frnt is blocked higher than sites rec but sills book does mention (2.5"), rear is 4.5".Feeling like I may be tieing the LR down with to much rebound and too stiff on the RR Comp, but that and adding/subtracting turns is where I'm twisting myself up over how this car reacts to the HP.
Thanks again !
shelloil23 (Offline)
#9
7/8/17 1:08 AM
Read that write up, It was excellent and part of what got me thinking about how the lower HP levels could affect the car.