cecil98 (Offline)
#21
4/30/08 5:20 PM
Galt might be a phoney but this Patrick Long guy (from Oregon) is for real. I heard his interview on a talk radio show the other day. He wants a 2 year moratorium on NASCAR racing, after which it's affects on society and the environment will be reassessed.
AERO410SCJA (Offline)
#23
4/30/08 5:49 PM
He don't need a hoax for that Chuck:rolling
Larryoracing (Offline)
#25
4/30/08 6:12 PM
I think the world should just put a ban on having children.
Let civilization die out for a while like the dinasours, then when
the next fish comes to land and evolves into a human being we can
start the whole process over again.
I think God's plan is something like that anyhow, isn't it?
We have had fun though, while we were here didn't we...lol!
Larry "O"
P.S. God Bless you.:applaud:
BrentTFunk (Offline)
#26
4/30/08 6:58 PM
Chuck, this reminds me of every Christmas someone posts that some "liberal" is going to eliminate Christmas. Anything that brings in as much money as nascar and Christmas will NEVER be done away with. The 3 percent that run our country would never allow it.
Gregg (Offline)
#27
4/30/08 7:40 PM
In the span of one year, 1955 five top AAA open wheel racers lost their lives, Iron Mike Nazaruk, Larry Crockett, Jack McGrath, 1955 Indy 500 polesitter Jerry Hoyt and Indy 500 icon Bill Vukovich. To top it all off 82 spectators plus a drivr lost their lives at Le Mans. And I'm not even counting local racers or NASCAR drivers in the tally. If ever some nutcase could lead a movement to ban racing 1955 was it. Didn't happen, not that it wasn't tried.
If racing or a part of racing was not banned after that disastrous year of 1955, what makes anyone think NASCAR, who is stronger than any American racing series ever, could possibly be on the road to being banned today.
My advice, don't pay attention to blogs unless the author happens to be Lauren Besecker or other trustworthy racing bloggers. For one thing I never once read that bloggers need to pass any kind of intellegence test
Charles Nungester
(Online)
#28
4/30/08 7:55 PM
Gregg, By your logic, Board tracks should still exist.
That was the direct result of Govt. Intervention. Although a war and high maintainence cost had some to do with it..
A state senator actually demanded the ellimination of it.
Chuck, saying the Plummett Mall thing was 25 years ago and that was ran as commercials on a station known for practical jokes. They still do it today.
Charles Nungester
Jerry Shaw (Offline)
#30
5/1/08 9:35 AM
It's good to shine the light on idiots, like this one, just so you know what's being said by people on the fringe. This is one case, that even though many of us poke fun at NASCAR, that the big corporate racing conglomerate is all racing fans' friend. Even though some lunatics may be spewing this stuff in some circles, finding a large enough group of legislators to make laws to ban racing, would be impossible. The NASCAR fan base represents a huge voting block. There's not enough sum total Political Courage in all of Washington D.C. to chance alienating that big of a voting block. Not even close. And as far as state laws go, this is Indiana. The loss of tax revenue from the abscence of the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400, alone, would cripple the state.
Jerry
A man is about as big as the things that make him angry.
Winston Churchill