ossuks (Offline)
#92
11/6/07 9:54 AM
Comparing wing vs non-wing drivers is an argument that will go on forever. Once in a while a driver will cross over and have limited success.
What I have used as a comparision is those that have moved up to other forms of racing and have been successful.
Barney (Offline)
#97
11/6/07 10:20 AM
I think the most of Claytons wrecks are self induced 1 car events.:action-smiley-049::doh::headbang:
riskybrisky5 (Offline)
#99
11/6/07 10:26 AM
Why can't people quit arguing about who is better drivers wing or non wing. They both produce great drivers. The difference is that in wing racing it takes the best equipment to win. Not saying that driving is not a part of it because it is. But all the top guys have the equipment. That is why a Darland or Coons or whoever cannot go to an Outlaw show and compete. It takes equipment. Put those guys in a top notch car and within a few races they will compete. Winners are winners you can put them in either car and they will win. Give me an unlimited budget and I can get Darland an outlaw win. Bring Steve Kinser to USAC and he will win. Why because they are both great race car drivers.
P.S. I will take Wolfgang over Swindell If I had a Woo car jmho
Mike Hunt
#100
11/6/07 10:41 AM
WOW! Lets see if this was one of the famed Indiana sprint car drivers this post would of been yanked!
Kevin has more talent than 99.9% of the drivers in the pits! I'm pretty sure you will not have to worry about him anymore as he is going to stock cars next year and Brad Sweet is driving that car. Oh wait you all will mutha fock him cause he isn't from Indiana!
Alrighty then start your botching! Lord knows Chuck and Dan will be the 1st!
No talk of how super hero Jon Stambrough ran all weekend???