Home | Register | Quick Links | FAQ | Donate | Contact |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
12/9/09, 1:47 PM |
#1
2010 midget rule change?
|
|
Member
Race Count This Year: 1 Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 14 |
Just a concerned fan...
USAC is considering mandating a rev limiter on the national midget division for 2010, under 9000 RPMs? While I agree some sort of engine cost control would be in order... How do you police it? Why do you penalize the many Esslinger motors that dont hit their powerband until 9000+? Its easy to limit the MSD box with a chip, but Electromotive? Old-style Magneto? Perhaps the national series would be better suited as a "toyota" spec series requiring everyone to purchase new $40k motors. Thats good cost control. Just another rule that the rich guys can spend money to find a way to go faster, and the little guy cant compete. I hope this wasnt true. Maybe someone in Orlando can give us an update. At one time, this was the best racing in the country. |
|
|
12/9/09, 2:18 PM |
#2
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 156 |
Is it the perfect solution? No
Will it help? Somewhat, at least it's a step in the right direction We don't need another spec racing series. |
||
|
12/9/09, 4:21 PM |
#3
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 16 |
Wonder who came up with this bright idea?
It looks like to me Toyota behind this since their motors hit the the power about 8800-9000 rpm. Don't forget about how USAC needs to operate-$$$$$$$ Maybe go to a 8" wide RR |
|
12/9/09, 4:39 PM |
#4
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 294 |
Mistake in my opinion. Forcing the racers to redesign/retune engines is going to hurt the car count and they need all the cars they can get with sponsors pulling out and teams leaving the series. If they want to help the series, they need to do something to reduce costs not increase them.
|
||
|
12/9/09, 5:15 PM |
#5
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
||
Senior Member
Race Count This Year: 22 Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 338 |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
If you look in your mirror and see a line of cars behind you, be kind and pull over.
![]() |
||
|
12/9/09, 7:46 PM |
#6
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 55 |
Has Don M. changed has board name.
|
|
|
12/9/09, 8:19 PM |
#7
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 332 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What is all boils down to is USAC is listening to a manufacture, and not the members that make these races happen. Maybe now is time to start another series and finally sink USAC
_________________________________________________
Last edited by Heromaker; 12/9/09 at 8:20 PM. |
||||
|
12/9/09, 8:43 PM |
#8
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 27 |
so lets keep it how it is and it will be a spec esslinger series the last time i looked esslinger has never sponsored usac.This will help midget racing the guys that dont have to crank there motors more to keep up with esslingers it will level out the engine deal and it will save people money
|
|
|
12/9/09, 8:56 PM |
#9
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 243 |
Is it just me or has Toyota hurt every series they have run in?
I wasn't a big fan of VW midgets when they first came around, but I am thinking they would be the way to go anymore. They might not be competitive anymore with all those special engines, but if they only had to run against other VW midgets, I think the racing would be better. |
|
|
12/9/09, 9:16 PM |
#10
Re: 2010 midget rule change?
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 33 |
This will raise a stink but here goes.... NOW enters Traction Control !!!
|
|
|
![]() |