Originally Posted by midgetmaniac:
You wouldn't be talking about the mighty USAC would you
That is what burns me up about them. Absolutely no emphasis on heats. Blow them off , start in the front of the B win it and get your qualifying time back and start in front again. I say you only get your time back if you transfer through your heat. If you run the B you start in the back.
Amen, brother. Those rules were developed in the 70's. It's time to get with the times IMO.
The real kicker is what do the FANS think of watching heat races...and, qualifying for that matter.
I bet you'd be surprised. Fans know when racers are coasting through their heats.
I'm starting to like the pill draw plus passing points more & more personally.
Just my 2-cents.
---------- Post added at 10:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------
Originally Posted by cshuman:
Anyone watched a USAC sprint week heat race lately?? qualifying good and starting row 4 with a stacked heat is a pretty touch assignment, so as a driver, its nice to be rewarded in the B for a good qualifying effort. I know everyone sitting in the stands would love to see Jones, Stanbrough, Darland, Coons, etc all start 20th thru 24th to put on a show, I would too, but from a drivers side, it is nice to be rewarded for laying down a good lap. Just like it SHOULD be rewarded for a 8th to 3rd run in a heat race with the draw format. I am all for qualifying, but if we draw the Sprint Bandit format is hands down the best. Going to Bloomington with 70 plus cars, and drawing inside row 6 for a heat, and taking 2!!Makes it fun for the fans, not so much for the drivers. There are going to be alot of winning drivers going home because of a bad draw, and guys make the show that probly shouldnt..
You raise a VERY good point. Okay, what about meeting half-way?
Wouldn't it be cool to decide by coin flip for standard qualifying vs. pill-draw w/passing points?
And, this be decided w/the sanctioning body & track promoter by that coin flip & communicated at pit sign-in?
Would this be too radical or extreme?
Let the feedback fly!
Jimmy B.
---------- Post added at 10:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------
Originally Posted by EldoraMark:
I’ve been reading these post the last few days, saying to myself don’t
get involve. Than I was awaking this morning by my radio. The news man
said we lost 8 of our young service men over the weekend fighting for our
country. Here we our bickering over two drivers who did not want to race.
Think what the families and friends of these service men are going through.
Could you imaging what there comment would be if you were to tell them
what you are complaining about. It seems so insignificant.
Couldn’t we all utilize our time better? Maybe for starters, praying for the families
of these service men. Or posting positive things.
Kevin Briscoe and Jerry Shaw hit the nail on the head about posting positive.
Mark Fritz
Mark -- You are absolutely right about supporting our troops. I am a Air Nat'l Guard retiree w/20 yrs of service and completely understand the level of sacrifice of these brave, selfless men & women. They deserve our thoughts, prayers, and respect.
You mention the word "insignificant". Maybe. Hopefully, we are all smart enough to filter out "insignificant" vs. "constructive" and "passionate".
Thanks for posting your reply,
Jimmy B.