bherzog513 (Offline)
#32
4/13/10 12:17 AM
I do not understand. The pill that you draw is a random value, of which you were given. The driver had nothing to do with the number he recieved nor can he change the outcome in anyway. As long as a procedure for the heat race setup is established before the first pill is drawn, how can anything be any more or any less fair?
If the setup for the heats claimed that the highest number drawn started on the pole and I drew a number 1, I would be mad that I wasn't racing at "blank" track that scored that pill as inside front row, but I see know way in rationalizing that thought. As I said, I don't understand the argument, can someone fill me in on what I am not seeing?
2 Likes:
BrentTFunk, mowerman
Sprint63122 (Offline)
#33
4/13/10 1:11 AM
Well I guess he did continue to go ahead and race in the program saturday night after the pill draw which is good.Unlike a so called champion from another series last year at lawrenceburg did not like his pill draw then tried to enter there other car and use his pill draw then threw a fit when that was not allowed and loaded both cars up this driver is what we call worthless in my book was glad to see damion prove them all wrong in driving to the front in that feature last year.Plus what chuck posted earlier on this topic that both Kunz cars drew in the back of there heats and still buckled up and went racing and Darland won the feature to.A lot of these drivers should take a good long look in the mirror and see how drivers like Darland and Coon's to name a couple conduct themselves both on and off the track.I appreciate that I am able to watch a few drivers that still have some manners and respect for sprint car racing.
Charles Nungester (Offline)
#34
4/13/10 4:01 AM
I wasn't implying his view is right or wrong, Just wondering why, If he was treated the same as everyone else that there is a problem?
I pointed out that the track was good and wide and able to pass on as evidenced by both kunz cars coming from the tail. Babb in the consi passed a bunch of cars and Windom came from 14th to 4th in the feature.
Ive seen low budget teams start near the tail of features and finish top five, Ive seen teams start 14th in a USAC show and WIN.
Charles Nungester
Shawn (Offline)
#36
4/13/10 11:43 AM
I'm not sure what happened, but TQ97's post brought up some valid points. J.T. raced with a TQ organization that used the same procedure. He raced with them for a long time. Now, all of the sudden, it's an issue. I'm not sure I understand.
It's called "luck of the draw". No matter how you do a draw, you're not increasing your chances. You have the same odds of drawing out a 60, as opposed to your 6, period! Maybe some just don't think things through before posting.
AP64 (Offline)
#38
4/13/10 12:26 PM
No matter what you do, you are going to make someone upset. The current draw system works, and it's equal for everyone. I would leave it as is.
A good friend of mine always says,"If you can't run with the big dogs, stay home".
IndySprintCar (Offline)
#39
4/13/10 12:40 PM
Dumbest post ever.
The ONLY point of the pill draw is to randomize the starting grid for the heats. Whatever "formula" the track uses to turn the pill draw "order" into a lineup sheet is immaterial as long as it is done the same way each week.
Nobody "wins" the pill draw. It is what it is.