Home | Register | Quick Links | FAQ | Donate | Contact |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
12/12/14, 1:12 PM |
#1
Why 410 cu in?
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 463 |
How did sprint car racing decide on 410 for cubic inch limit? When did this come about?
|
|
|
12/12/14, 2:18 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 425 |
Cause the pa posse was kicking tail with big blocks,,some were steel crate blocks with factory aluminum heads,different cam add injectors and a motor the could run almost all season with maybe a bearing check half way in the season and the Woo couldn't control it when they raced there ,they were the first series to have a 410 rule and everyone just follow after that , If I remember correctly
|
|
12/12/14, 2:49 PM |
#3
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,706 |
Bobby Layne from Kansas City also ran a big block sprint until the WoO told him no more
|
||
|
12/12/14, 3:52 PM |
#4
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 368 |
As far as the “when” I believe it was around 1985 when the World of Outlaws went with the 410 standard and other tracks and series followed suit. As was mentioned, the flash point was out East. Big blocks had been legal at the Pennsylvania tracks. Things started to get out of hand when some of the better funded PA teams, such as Al Hamilton’s, started using higher dollar all-aluminum Rodeck engines that checked in at over 500 cubes. It’s a shame that the big blocks were legislated out of the sport. A lot of inventory was made obsolete. Those old big blocks sounded great too!
|
||
|
12/12/14, 6:10 PM |
#5
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 5,957 |
So what I am hearing if a prominent group develops a good rule that works well for them other groups will follow also just because it is a good rule and makes sense to them also, kind of like lead by example. That is a very good IDEA.
I do kind of miss the old big blocks. Honest Dad himself ![]() ![]() |
||
|
12/13/14, 2:27 AM |
#6
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 6,725 |
Quote:
I was lucky enough to watch those big blocks scream down the frontstretch at Port Royal and Williams Grove. |
||
12/14/14, 10:55 AM |
#7
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 2,424 |
Quote:
A lot of people were using Chevy 400 cast iron small blocks. The 400 Chevy had a bore size as 4 1/8" and a crank stroke size of 3 3/4" The largest you could safely bore the stock Chevy block was .060 oversize making 408 cubic inches. To include the growing popularity of Aluminum blocks and to keep the iron blocks competitive they settled on 410 cubic inches. Most teams using an aluminum block then were staying with the Chevy bore size of 4 1/8" and increasing the stroke size to 4 7/8" to make it exactly 410 cubic inches Not a good explanation I know but on just my first energy drink this morning. .
__________________
Find a purpose in life ..... Be a bad example
|
||
|
12/14/14, 10:58 AM |
#8
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 791 |
Turn your Sub-Woofer up to No.10 and enjoy
![]() Warm Up - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qFti5cuWtQ Racing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16S9KBXH0uM
__________________
UK USAC fan. No Invert, No Interest. No Gimmick Racing.
_________________________________________________
Last edited by Stephen Cording; 12/14/14 at 11:06 AM. |
||
|
12/14/14, 12:01 PM |
#9
Re: Why 410 cu in?
|
||
Senior Member
Race Count This Year: 6 Race Count Last Year: 14 Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 22,022 |
Take out the S in the https when posting videos from youtube. Little trick Bill Taught me.
__________________
Charles Nungester
|
||
|
12/14/14, 12:19 PM | #10 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 173 |
The old 22. Big bertha, I think it was called was fun to watch.
|
||
|
![]() |