Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles Nungester
Wow, 12 test by three companies and a check by a major tire manufacturer. the original tester found four teams cheated not once but twice. The two other testers found four teams DID NOT CHEAT, Not once but twice. and peer reviewed. So the positives for cheating are four and the negatives for cheating are eight
Sounds like USAC did it's job diligently to me, They got nothing to gain by suspending or fining people unless it's absolutely necessary.
So lets keep on with the USAC bashing. Id be interested to find out if the Xtreme test were from the same positives Testing company that found the USAC samples to be "DOPED" Seems to me their credibility is tarnished. Not USAC's
Xtreme can do as it likes, They found two to be cheating and delt the penalties. Totally separate event. But if the company that USAC used was used originally. That puts Their findings in question to me.
|
So there were 6 samples taken, 4 were positive based on the information we have been given. So what do you tell the two teams that were tested and weren't in violation with the initial testing sample with rogue testing company that matched the same "benchmark" sample? Were those samples re-tested as well by all three companies? What where their findings if they were tested, all three test negative?
Here is food for thought. They should take two samples from the tire. Clearly, there is a flaw here if they are using the same sample for all tests. This is why there is an A sample and B sample when drug testing. If the A is positive you open the B sample. If the B is positive then you are a positive test. You cant re-use the same A sample because its been contaminated. How do you validate that the samples are still valid in a case as such?