1/23/16, 2:41 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 274
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ29m
Personally, I think I'd like to see them go with a "stock appearing" configuration on the engines, maintain the 2.0/2.4 size, but let you do some head work, add some good perf cams, and bump up the compression some, I think these engines would respond well to some good cams, compression, and some head work, minor of course, don't want to make them hand grenades, but not allowing any upgrades really costs more than what I'm leaning to, I've already priced the cams, pistons, and head mods, and so far it is around 1K, if you can tear it down and put it back together yourself, just can't really see a "stock" engine being very exciting, without being really costly. JMHO! Bob
|
You could have a talk with the powers that be and may be able to have some special concessions for your engine since it's only a 2.0. Couldn't hurt to ask!
|
|
|