[team3521]

Originally Posted by LEADERS EDGE If a trained monkey in a Bell Hop Uniform riding a mini bike could bring in more sponsorship money....it would be in charge. Why would USAC get rid of someone who brings in $$$$? As I am aware and I could be wrong....he has a base salary that has not changed and works on commission. The more $ he finds the more $ he gets The disconnect is that the racing is used as the sales pitch....but the sponsorship $ and what have you is used to pay overhead and I would imagine prop up shows that are marginal on getting done. If USAC has been screwed up for 40 plus years or what have you and it's had numerous different faces in charge during that time....at some point you have to start thinking that who the people think is in charge and what their job directive is....isn't what you think it is. It's not about the racing.

SPOT ON! Thank you!