View Single Post
3/26/15, 3:06 PM   #22
Re: Midget racing's identity crisis
xoxide
xoxide is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 569
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by MHess View Post
The high cost of Gasoline?? haha

I really don't feel the mechanical part of midget motors are that much different or advanced. I do believe that the electronics on midget motors have made a world of difference in performance.

I also feel that Carbon Fiber nor titanium is needed in midget racing. The costs of these products are staggering. I'd be happy to see it illegal. I'd also like to see a weight rule without the driver again.

If these products are outlawed and the weight rule changed, then lets make bolt on weight illegal also. Go back to being able to build a midget with aluminum, fiberglass, and steel bolts that makes the weight without having to bolt weight on.

Oh well opinions are like....or something like that.
Ti and Carbon aren't the problem. People think "oh if you ban this part or that part itll make it more fair and cheaper for all".... My opinion is, if I want to spend the money on Titanium or Carbon, I should be allowed to. (Not speaking of rotating Ti), but neither has ANY performance advantage to it. If im meeting weight rules, it should not matter. If you cannot afford to buy ti, or carbon that's perfectly fine! Some people can, and some people want to.

Now we can argue a lighter car means placing weight where you want it to meet weight.... Whatever. Quit making more rules ruling out more parts, and lets all just race! Weve seen people time in and time out beat top of the line cars with hoopty's....

I can understand no rotating ti, but past that, the "no carbon/ti" rule is ridiculous.

Sincerely,
The 21 year old college student running an ecotec with titanium parts- because I worked my ass off to be able to afford nice parts.
_________________________________________________
Last edited by xoxide; 3/26/15 at 3:08 PM.
 
2 members like this post: DAD, Ken Bonnema