Originally Posted by Dano959:
Boston kinda touched on this, but you say it's all about the money, NOT any of the things that aussie said, correct? Well, why is WoO able to pay the money to be on TV and USAC isn't? Seems to me that maybe some of the things that aussie mentioned come in to play, whether it is in relation to raising the money to pay for airtime, or if it translates directly to being provided with free airtime...........
Are you serious? OK, try this on for size. WoO's for profit parent company has much, much deeper pockets than USAC does. That's how. Any more questions? Believe me, TV is all about money. Nothing is free. It has nothing to do with quality. American Idol is proof of that. I guarantee you that if USAC had the $$$ to be on TV, they would be there. When Thunder was on years ago, the TV landscape was very different.