View Single Post
17racer (Offline)
  #34 12/16/12 4:13 PM
What is the goal here guys? Affordible engines or national engines? They are not the same and they dont do too well together once you get to a bigger track. Why keep trying to race them together???? falling car counts?
It seems like RRE cant get rules to make their program competative enough, yet Stanton gets to piggy back on the exception that was granted to Esslinger???? Its simply money that talks. And Lobbying. Back a couple years ago.... somehow Fontana was granted inches to get to 174, yet the rhino 200 ci motor, sealed, at half the cost, was not allowed or worse, wasnt bought ???
Maybe RRE should be granted additional inches if they want to compete on the national midget level. Submit a reasonible design. It seems the reluctance is in that you could hypothetically show up with a 4 valve motor at
500+ hp. Lets say that happens and they produce 8 of them per year and one team gets them all??? how are we any better off? Any one see a problem here??? remind anyone of the Toyota deal??
There needs to be a reasonibly level playing field for National midgets and for regional midgets.....
Likes: Revolution Racing