View Single Post
Phylo82 (Offline)
  #6 2/5/12 4:46 PM
It's not negative spin....it's the truth. You found a loop-hole to take the track away from QMA by having the board vote because you knew a membership vote wouldn't pass it. That vote had already been attempted twice in the past three years. Well played. I hope it works out for you because it's a great facility and an awesome track.

I was no fan of QMA.....they did a lot of things horribly wrong. One thing on the positive side is they pretty much exist for QM racing. My concern with USAC and .25 was, in my opinion, the moment .25 isn't making them money or starts costing them money they'll bail. Time will tell I guess.

Glad to hear that membership is up. My advice to anyone that is running the place, do away with lifetime memberships and multiple votes per driver (one driver-one vote)......that will get rid of your 'cling-ons' that haven't had a driver there in years yet still get to vote on everything.