Thread: Hut Hundred
View Single Post
5/9/11, 5:29 PM   #15
Re: Hut Hundred
Andrew S. Quinn
Andrew S. Quinn is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,279
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThrowbackRacingTeam View Post
Another in a long line of blunders by midget asssociations. Why doesn't Poweri just follow suit with usac & badger? Is it an enforcement issue? How are they enforcing that rule? (rev limit). I heard Badger's is 200 rpm's lower than usac. Why wouldn't they just make it the same so it's easier to race with each other? What if a car hits a wet spot or goes over a bump and over revs, are they still disqualified? Poweri has booked against usac more than with them in recent years, so this comes as no surprise. Regardless, the fans lose once again.
Maybe USAC and Badger should follow suit with PowrI to see what they are doing right! PowrI has had decent midget fields at their races the last few years. Same with ARDC,that are getting good fields of cars. Seems to me that PowrI and ARDC must be doing something right.

---------- Post added at 05:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:29 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clydesdale View Post
I would think you lost at least 10-12 cars. And a good field of mini-sprints. Let me get this right, this went from one of the must see races of the year to no big deal now. Especially with a 3 hour drive from Indy. Now we get to watch about 25-30 midgets, and maybe 20 modifieds, that spin out all the time at this track. Why not add the sprint cars? You would have midget drivers that would run both, and then it would be a must see race.
I'll agree with that. I was planning on going down,but now might have to really give it some thought.
 
3 members like this post: mowerman, skids59, wobbler