Originally Posted by hoosierfan:
So consistantly running in the top 5 or 10 shouldn't be rewarded? In my understanding of running for championships they count just as much as wins. I'm sure though if BC would have been around the whole season this wouldn't be a topic for discussion.
Posted via Mobile Device
If BC wasn't around , then BK would be way ahead in the points for midgets. I think you would still see the 2 Brad's up there though because BK has been so consistant in the top 3 and BS having more w's but having more dnf's. BC like BS has alot of wins and dnf 's compared to BK. To me, the pts may only be different from the stand point of BC being higher in the pt standings due to his wins compared to what they are now. All 3 should be at the next level of racing.
