Quote:
Originally Posted by midmad68
a lot of great points. I have to agree with u with the statement about usac turning their focus toward the quater midgets and off-road trucks (at least it appears that way). Having two different cars for dirt and pavement is rediculous. The tire bill to run pavement is rediculous (a few thousand dollars for just one weekend). The only way to control these cost are with more rules...but there's already enough of those. It's a catch 22 as far as i can see. Pavement racing will continue as long as there are enough rich guys who are willing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to field these cars.
Mj
|
usac pavement sprint on the national level is done at the end of the year!
---------- Post added at 04:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:36 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinser
as scary as it is i agree with you on a couple of things. I think that you should have to run dirt to have a championship trail. I also agree about the tire width. I disagree about the rear engine cars. When the rear engine cars were around you had to have 2 cars, because the rear engine cars wouldn't work on dirt.
posted via mobile device
|
well you have to have two cars now!!!!!!! And there where 5 -6 rear engine cars then!!!! It would have been a stepping stone to the 500! Ask tom sneva!