|
What was the final result on Clauson's engine
What was the final result on Clauson's engine pumping BIG?
|
We pulled the head so they could check bore and stroke, checked out fine. Thanks Tim Clauson
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Thanks for the update. That good news to hear.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Having had to pull heads in the pits (in the dirt) with another race the next night (and being legal), I know what a pain in the nose that is. What's the story here? Did someone protest? You don't usually protest someone who finished 4th. I know he started 14th, but there were others who had good runs, too.
|
Quote:
While this has hurt our chances this weekend as it has put our best piece out of commission I just want to say that I feel USAC handled this situation exactly how it should of been handled and while a hardship for our team at this time USAC did a great job at taking care of a situation that could of gotten out of control and damaged a reputation that we have worked many years to acquire. The top 5 were pumped again last night and my guess the top 5 will be pumped agiain tonight. My only wish is that the person who was so quick to throw us under the bus could of just waited until all the facts were known, before putting myself, my team, my sponsors and the organization under a unnecessary and unfair bad light. I hope everyone makes out here tonight because if last years event and the last 2 nights are any indication this could well be the race of the year. Thank, Tim Clauson Posted via Mobile Device |
I love it when someone tells it like it really is. No drama. Just facts!!!
Your a class act Tim!! Posted via Mobile Device |
If you feel their comments damaged your reputation then maybe the person or persons need(s) a lesson in slander/libel and compensatory damages ;-)
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Are those really the facts? Was the proper equipment used to measure the motor? Something smells funny? "They tore our motor down and it was legal and we think USAC is great and they handled everything perfectly"
If you believe this smoke scream you probably believe Lee Harvy acted alone! |
Quote:
Quote:
SLIDEJOB! Posted via Mobile Device |
Must not be a Clauson fan.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
I wish you folks would not quote ossuks -- I blocked him a long time ago due to repeated crap like he posted here, but his posts get around my block when someone quotes him.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
No attorney necessary for that :) |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Looks like cased closed. Just ignore the trolls and move on. Good run by the way, 14th to fourth.
|
How can an engine pump big? Do they use some device that measures the amount of air the piston displaces from the cylinder?
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
As far as I know, they would be using the conventional "swept volume" method, disable the valves on a cylinder, and hook into the sparkplug hole, and roll it over a few times, and ck the markings on the glass, but, I've seen them be under, more than over, that's why Nascar has for the past several years, recheck them by actual measuring the bore and stroke. Bob!:)
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
I have "no dog in this fight" so I think I can be fairly objective. I've researched info on "Cubic Inch Testers" provided by the manufacturers of the test equipment and independent articles and they all agree on 2 issues. 1. Test equipment errors are always to the small size. 2. If it pumps BIG, it's BIG!.
|
Don't you have to consider atmospheric conditions? Temperature?Pressure? Humidity? They proved the other night that "pumping big" doesn't mean your motor is over. Unless you're one who thinks a deal was made.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Just wondering if that was your best motor and was legal after USAC checked it why you didn't put it back together and run it the next night?
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
yes, there are variables that will change the readings.....and they have to be factored in for the correct reading.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Ok $29.00 dollar head gasket @NAPA FEL-PRO 8993PT-1 with 9-small extra holes only one needed And enclosed trailer 2hr. max. Race next night. NO need to stand their with your pants around your ankles and cry poor me! Or you can put the 161cu.in. back in an we will turn and look for some one with out dated seat belts. Thats not one of the golden one's
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Another board was lit up after the Knoxville nationals regarding the winner pumping too big...apparently they pumped 7 times before it showed legal...un-involved motor builders explained that aluminum engines will pump slightly bigger if pumped when hot due to metal expansion and that once the engine returned to atmospheric temp, which is what the rule states, the engine in question was fine...I would ASSUME something similar happened to the Clausons, and the bore and stroke test is the only true way to determine displacement.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
If USAC is the premier midget class why even have a engine rule ? If it will fit in a midget and the car pass's safety tech, good to go. If anything usac should have a portable dyno, test the cars at a certain rpm, if they're over the h.p. reading at the end of race they dqed.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
Since virtually all sanctioning organizations have rules that call for further testing if an engine pumps big then they must not have faith in the "if it pumps big, it's big" theory. I know you claim to be objective so it must be a coincidence that your caps lock key malfunctions when you type the word "big". |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
none of this really matters if the head was popped and the motor was measured and found legal.
and if the clausons didnt want to put the motor back together in the parking lot, who is anyone to question that? next time....put the money up and have it torn down if it bothers you so much. |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
Midgets started off the program with bang. Three of those heats were the best three heats I'd seen all year. Three and four wide, banzai moves with little to no room to thread the needles that they were threading, like it was nothing! I love midgets on this track! When those heats were over I had a scratchy throat from yelling and a scrape on my left elbow from leaning far enough to contact the open wooden bleacher spot beside me. The track did kind of go away as the evening progressed and that did have an effect on the racing, some. It was still a really good race, though. East led for most of the early going, but was converged upon by Clauson and Hagen (at Granite City, that's what you call your worst nightmare) and when East dropped down to protect against Hagen, Clauson got around him on the outside and just slowly checked out. A Kyle Larson blown tire with two laps left provided Hagen with a last shot. As they restarted, you heard the familiar sick sound that only a midget motor that is laying down can make coming from BC's car, opportunity knocked, Hagen answered the door and drove home unchallenged for the win. It's amazing that BC was able to hold off Zach Daum, who was on a late race rampage and the always high-flying Brad Sweet, to hold on to the second spot. I heard the same thing as Jerry, that engine was sick, so legal or not I'm thinking it needed pulled and sent to the engine Dr. anyway and the assembly would have been irrelivant. Steve |
Letter sent out today by USAC...
United States Auto Club 10/10 2011 USAC pumped (engines) top 5 finishers from each A-main at Gold Crown Midget event. As all know by now we incurred a engine that pumped above accepted cubic inch for that manufacturer (big) the team in question Clauson Racing. I was person (Dave Brzozowski) that personally did all engines and the Clauson car was last to be done, the option is DQ or remove cylinder head for bore and stroke measurement for true displacement. The measurement was taken and verified graciously by Rick Long of Speedway Engine and as a witness concluded that engine was legal. I was very confused how going from one engine to the next and same brand (esslinger) this is possible. I could not stop thinking of how or what would cause an engine to pump big if it is truly within its specifications. We continued our pumping procedure for the next night with no issues. I looked and questioned all parts and procedures and on Saturday morning while looking at pump piston realized and verified how its possible besides obvious of reading numbers incorrect, mistake can be made by installing piston in pump upside down. I pumped an engine that same morning later and it was good I asked team if they minded me doing a test (piston upside down) it pumped big. I always remove piston and seal between test to clean and lube I am completely confident that I installed piston upside down (even though its marked) before pumping the Clauson car. The piston has a nipple on one side to compress relief valve at bottom of tube to relieve pressure on each stroke, not doing this pushes piston further up tube. I take complete responsibly for this mistake and apologize to Clauson Racing and USAC for any negativity this created over a great weekend of Midget Racing during the Gold Crown. Sincerely, Dave Brzozowski Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Quote:
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
Tim Clawson says he's legal and USAC says he's legal. That would apparently be it.
|
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
I appreciate Dave Brzozowski stepping up to clarify the source of the confusion surrounding the engine check. Those of you who are so determined to bad-mouth BC and the team need to quit taking Viagra for a while.
So please quit :deadhorse: |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
LOL, so the piston was upside down. Now I do not feel so bad for having done that a time or two.........:14:
And I can verify that if the piston is upside down, it will pump big. With the 360 motores I was pumping, they would come out around 16-24 ci's too big. |
Re: What was the final result on Clauson's en
who can't appreciate a place where questions can be asked, issues can be raised, explanations can be heard, mistakes can be acknowledged, and we move forward.
Thank you Bill Gardner for IOW, thank you Tim Clauson for being forthright, and thank you to whomever it was that admitted the mistake and detailed explanation of why it happened. I don't know about anyone else, but I learned something today. Facts mam, just the facts. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 3:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2005-2025 IndianaOpenWheel.com