![]() |
Buckley Yoke thoughts
I am wondering what the non wing guys think about the Buckley style yoke.
All your thoughts are greatly appreciated. 1. How do they help or hurt. 2. How many do you see being used in your area? 3. Is it just hype? |
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
I guess I'll take a swing at your questions, doesn't appear that anyone else wants to, and I'm almost as clueless, maybe more so, than you. I have seen them used, and honestly am not sure of the reason. Just looking at one, it does look like they would maybe better locate the torque tube, and if everything is geometrically aligned, radius rods and etc, might make a smoother action at the u-joint bend centers. I don't really get excited about having the yokes and all the rotating stuff exposed to my feet and ankles, but I guess a guy could fab a cover, that would form some kind of minimum protection, but other than my opinion, I guess I haven't researched it far enough, to understand any advantage, over a conventional torque ball, mag hsg arrangement. Guess I didn't really say anything, did I? Bob!:)
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
Quote:
Tim Simmons |
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
If you'll google " buckley yoke", you'll find where to buy them, and some conversation about them, if it makes the car hook better, then I'd sure be willing to try one, my midget is a bit loose in the gitty up go mood. Looks like a fairly easy install, looks like it uses 2 of the current bolt holes on each side, that the mag hsg uses, I like the concept, and they do make them for a midget car. Bob!:)
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
Quote:
Tim Simmons |
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
On mine, I have a ring, with studs in it, on the motor side of the motorplate, that hold the mag hsg, and the ring is bolted to the motorplate with a couple of countersink head, allen bolts, to keep it from moving when serviceing the u-joint, it keeps the motorplate from stripping out, and reinforces it in that area, same could be done with the Buckley mount. Just an idee! Bob!:)
---------- Post added at 04:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:53 PM ---------- And, to add to the comment about the hard hits, I've had several, one took out the motorplate center, around the mag hsg, that's when I went to the backup ring, with the studs, and I use ferry head(12 point)nuts, which are somewhat self locking, but take a smaller socket, that allows you to get to them. Bob!:) |
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
So why do you think the Yoke makes the car hook up harder? If so, it seems it would be a item seen on more wingless cars than winged, right? Also I am wondering about the longer rear radius rods I am seeing, How are they helping?
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
two guys I know use them...one in a buckley car designed for this yoke...neither one wins all the races or even seams to have any advantage...one lost a freeze plug and scaulded his sons legs cause there is no containment...when some racers are opting to use steel torque ball housings to protect their legs why would you consider the least safe way? Buckleys have been around 15 plus years ...you see how few use them..i don't see an advantage with a buckley over a standard torque ball set up
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
Quote:
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
Used a Buckley yoke for years in a winged 41" Gambler car. It allowed a less than perfectly rear end center section to be used and still have the rear "free" throughout its travel.(The car hooked up very well) I used bolts threaded into the motor plate,with a reinforcement plate on the motor side,and nuts on the motor side. I crashed the car so hard one nite that it exploded the center section,and crushed the "Buckley"unit.The Motor plate survived. I still use a steel u-joint! I don't trust the aluminum ones. Most of my parts are "duty tested"(used).The magnesium ball would provide no margin of safety in a driveline explosion,anyway! With the buckley unit in the car as we mounted it,the possibility of the driveline taking out the pumps is much reduced,I think...... Any body else???
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
Thanks everyone for the great thoughts about the Yoke. I ran with the Yoke on a 360 winged car for many years, even won a championshipp with it so I was a fan. but I was not sure if it worked good on a non winged car.
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
We modified a steel maxim torque ball shield. Everything is studded in the motorplate as I was worried about the yoke stripping the threads in the magnesium plate. We machined two holes above the grease points of the yoke, and have no problems accessing anything for maintenance. Protecting the fuel pump is of concern, but I wanted to wait until it was installed to see how much room I had for a plate across the top. I plan to add that piece now.
On the first race out with this he took a spectacular crash that junked everything but the engine/fuel/elec system, the seat, the driver, and what you see in the picture. The torque tube was broke and the driveline was wound around the torque tube hoop, but the yoke was still good and nothing in this area was compromised. We run both the Buckley Yoke and a regular torque ball, but he really hasn't had enough experience to tell a difference. I just wanted to share what we put together for a guard. http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/j...p/100_0489.jpg |
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
I know of one driver that is missing some toes running this open tube deal. Another said they bolted it through the engine plate & ran it a long time. I'd say just keep a close eye on it.
|
Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
interesting conversation! I have 4 Gambler one asphalt 3 dirt cars and 1 actual Buckley sprinter with the Buckley torque tube setup in them. I do mostly vintage racing and just getting into the sprinters so I'm learning.:)
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2005-2025 IndianaOpenWheel.com