IndianaOpenWheel.com

Indiana Open Wheel (https://www.indianaopenwheel.com/index.php)
-   Indiana Open Wheel Forum (https://www.indianaopenwheel.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Buckley Yoke thoughts (https://www.indianaopenwheel.com/showthread.php?t=53691)

GIBBS 10/3/11 1:42 AM

Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
I am wondering what the non wing guys think about the Buckley style yoke.

All your thoughts are greatly appreciated.

1. How do they help or hurt.
2. How many do you see being used in your area?
3. Is it just hype?

TQ29m 10/4/11 12:42 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
I guess I'll take a swing at your questions, doesn't appear that anyone else wants to, and I'm almost as clueless, maybe more so, than you. I have seen them used, and honestly am not sure of the reason. Just looking at one, it does look like they would maybe better locate the torque tube, and if everything is geometrically aligned, radius rods and etc, might make a smoother action at the u-joint bend centers. I don't really get excited about having the yokes and all the rotating stuff exposed to my feet and ankles, but I guess a guy could fab a cover, that would form some kind of minimum protection, but other than my opinion, I guess I haven't researched it far enough, to understand any advantage, over a conventional torque ball, mag hsg arrangement. Guess I didn't really say anything, did I? Bob!:)

Tim 10/4/11 12:53 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GIBBS (Post 256433)
I am wondering what the non wing guys think about the Buckley style yoke.

All your thoughts are greatly appreciated.

1. How do they help or hurt.
2. How many do you see being used in your area?
3. Is it just hype?

We've used these exclusively for the last ten years or so both with and (mostly) without wings. We've had no issues with them. I find them to be user friendly, although I'm in the process of designing an enhancement to make maintenance easier. I fabricate a cover/guard for the rotating pieces out of an old ball casting and collar. I have a hypothesis on why, as is claimed, it hooks the car up harder but we've not used a ball in so long I can't remember whether I noticed a difference or not. As far as I know we're the only morons using them around Indiana, or anywhere I've been, which includes most areas of the country except out west. As far as hype, I've not seen any reference to these in a long time. I'm not even sure where to buy a new one.

Tim Simmons

TQ29m 10/4/11 1:31 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
If you'll google " buckley yoke", you'll find where to buy them, and some conversation about them, if it makes the car hook better, then I'd sure be willing to try one, my midget is a bit loose in the gitty up go mood. Looks like a fairly easy install, looks like it uses 2 of the current bolt holes on each side, that the mag hsg uses, I like the concept, and they do make them for a midget car. Bob!:)

Tim 10/4/11 2:41 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TQ29m (Post 256627)
If you'll google " buckley yoke", you'll find where to buy them, and some conversation about them, if it makes the car hook better, then I'd sure be willing to try one, my midget is a bit loose in the gitty up go mood. Looks like a fairly easy install, looks like it uses 2 of the current bolt holes on each side, that the mag hsg uses, I like the concept, and they do make them for a midget car. Bob!:)

The only problem I've found with them is that, since it is bolted on two pads which bolt onto the motor plate, when you get into a big crash that trashes the torque tube, it overstresses the pads and, therefore, the bolts/threads in the motor plate where the pads attach. What I've found is that the holes in the motor plate get distorted to the point of being unusable. At this point you either have to replace the motor plate or come up with another solution.

Tim Simmons

TQ29m 10/4/11 4:24 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
On mine, I have a ring, with studs in it, on the motor side of the motorplate, that hold the mag hsg, and the ring is bolted to the motorplate with a couple of countersink head, allen bolts, to keep it from moving when serviceing the u-joint, it keeps the motorplate from stripping out, and reinforces it in that area, same could be done with the Buckley mount. Just an idee! Bob!:)

---------- Post added at 04:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:53 PM ----------

And, to add to the comment about the hard hits, I've had several, one took out the motorplate center, around the mag hsg, that's when I went to the backup ring, with the studs, and I use ferry head(12 point)nuts, which are somewhat self locking, but take a smaller socket, that allows you to get to them. Bob!:)

GIBBS 10/4/11 11:04 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
So why do you think the Yoke makes the car hook up harder? If so, it seems it would be a item seen on more wingless cars than winged, right? Also I am wondering about the longer rear radius rods I am seeing, How are they helping?

dant 10/4/11 11:42 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
two guys I know use them...one in a buckley car designed for this yoke...neither one wins all the races or even seams to have any advantage...one lost a freeze plug and scaulded his sons legs cause there is no containment...when some racers are opting to use steel torque ball housings to protect their legs why would you consider the least safe way? Buckleys have been around 15 plus years ...you see how few use them..i don't see an advantage with a buckley over a standard torque ball set up

TQ29m 10/5/11 3:50 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GIBBS (Post 256703)
So why do you think the Yoke makes the car hook up harder? If so, it seems it would be a item seen on more wingless cars than winged, right? Also I am wondering about the longer rear radius rods I am seeing, How are they helping?

It sure would be nice, to have access to a simulator, or some other device, to watch what/how each piece reacts while doing it's job. I've always felt like if the radius rods pivot point, is the same as the torque tube/driveshaft pivot point, it would remove a lot of unwanted fore and aft motion of the tube and shaft, but, if you look at the short mounted rods, and try to visualize the motion they got thru, you might come away thinking that would provide a better hook, but, does it really make a difference, I can't say, I know once you start something, and if you have any luck with it, they will follow, just like coilover fronts, how many times have we seen that changed, Glen Neible used to like to fool with em, with the ladder mount, one time he'd have the links on the outside, next time they'd be inside, kept everyone busy changing them. Like the old saying goes, win a race with a dog turd on the hood, and next week, everyone will have one! I spent one whole winter, part time, with 1/2" wide strips of 16ga steel, and lots of paper, trying to make the perfect ladder shape, and link length, and finally got what I thought was danged close, and it does work, but, is it any better than one you buy off the shelf? Bob!:)

baldtireman 10/5/11 6:52 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
Used a Buckley yoke for years in a winged 41" Gambler car. It allowed a less than perfectly rear end center section to be used and still have the rear "free" throughout its travel.(The car hooked up very well) I used bolts threaded into the motor plate,with a reinforcement plate on the motor side,and nuts on the motor side. I crashed the car so hard one nite that it exploded the center section,and crushed the "Buckley"unit.The Motor plate survived. I still use a steel u-joint! I don't trust the aluminum ones. Most of my parts are "duty tested"(used).The magnesium ball would provide no margin of safety in a driveline explosion,anyway! With the buckley unit in the car as we mounted it,the possibility of the driveline taking out the pumps is much reduced,I think...... Any body else???

GIBBS 10/7/11 12:38 AM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
Thanks everyone for the great thoughts about the Yoke. I ran with the Yoke on a 360 winged car for many years, even won a championshipp with it so I was a fan. but I was not sure if it worked good on a non winged car.

Bluteam 10/15/11 5:17 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
We modified a steel maxim torque ball shield. Everything is studded in the motorplate as I was worried about the yoke stripping the threads in the magnesium plate. We machined two holes above the grease points of the yoke, and have no problems accessing anything for maintenance. Protecting the fuel pump is of concern, but I wanted to wait until it was installed to see how much room I had for a plate across the top. I plan to add that piece now.

On the first race out with this he took a spectacular crash that junked everything but the engine/fuel/elec system, the seat, the driver, and what you see in the picture. The torque tube was broke and the driveline was wound around the torque tube hoop, but the yoke was still good and nothing in this area was compromised.

We run both the Buckley Yoke and a regular torque ball, but he really hasn't had enough experience to tell a difference. I just wanted to share what we put together for a guard.

http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/j...p/100_0489.jpg

Bad Dad 54 10/15/11 11:00 PM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
I know of one driver that is missing some toes running this open tube deal. Another said they bolted it through the engine plate & ran it a long time. I'd say just keep a close eye on it.

Fyjimo 7/5/24 10:54 AM

Re: Buckley Yoke thoughts
 
interesting conversation! I have 4 Gambler one asphalt 3 dirt cars and 1 actual Buckley sprinter with the Buckley torque tube setup in them. I do mostly vintage racing and just getting into the sprinters so I'm learning.:)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2005-2025 IndianaOpenWheel.com