![]() |
And that last post is not meant to be a “dig” at anyone or their likes or dislikes. I just like the older stuff.
|
My point was, many of the body panels (not all) are there for a reason, and that reason is to help the drivers. Our sport, just like all the others are evolving, especially when it comes to safety. I agree that some of the cars back in the day looked badass. I think the same about some cars today as well. Sprint cars at one time had no roll cage, but that doesn’t mean we should do that now, just so a fan can see the drivers move their arms. Sprint car racing is more competitive then it has EVER been in my opinion. Doesn’t matter if it is local non wings, or the WoO there has never been such good racing. Go enjoy it 👍
|
Don’t disagree with that at all. After reading my post, it came off kind of smart a** and it wasn’t intended that way.
|
Re: observation #2, a revolution?
A 70 chevelle might look better then a new Honda but pales in all ways compared to say a new 700 hp Challenger or Camaro or mustang. I love old cars and never thought I'd say it but I'd take a brand new muscle car compared to a 60's or 70's car. As far as race cars, they hit they're peak with the gurney eagle.
|
Quote:
|
Looks matter. If all I cared about was good racing, I have two weekly stock car tracks in my hometown that provide that. Instead, I travel many hours to see sprint cars and like them because they look like sprint cars. Or, at least they used to. Don't go quite as much now and the look of the cars has a lot to do with that along with dusty tracks and the disappearance of most half mile racing.
|
Some good response from all of you and of course Casey I certainly value your opinion as your still out there getting it done on numerous levels. But like you said they ran without cages at places like Langhorne, seems not an unreasonable request to have no panels above the drivers sight line. Like I said, there's too many sprints and midgets to think about changing it,but the Big Car's, a series that I think should perhaps try to straddle the line between past and present, I think it should be considered. I still love it all, but some food for thought
|
The post about I just want to see just good hard racing, I don’t care what it is,has to be the most illogical statement ever made on these pages.if I go to the Indianapolis 500 I want to see Indy Cars,not mini stocks.When something ceases to be what it once was it is no longer that.Exhibit A,formula one cars with halo.Personally,I don’t mind the look of the Sprint cars and Midgets of today,but I know of many people who could care less because they bare lttle resemblance to the cars of the past.They are sprintcars in name only.One of only many reasons why this type of racing is dying.
|
Re: observation #2, a revolution?
Quote:
|
Re: observation #2, a revolution?
There is a delicate balance between safety and sports entertainment. I continue to be concerned about the spectator being able to connect with human element of the sport. IMHO this is one of the reasons that various forms of motorsport prosper while others are on the wane. No one wants to sacrifice safety, however, it would seem their should be reasonable compromise for fan enjoyment and competitor safety.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 3:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2005-2025 IndianaOpenWheel.com