IndianaOpenWheel.com Sprint Car & Midget Racing Forum
Forgot Password?

Reply  Indiana Open Wheel > Indiana Open Wheel Forum > USAC and D2 Midgets
Thread Tools
12/6/15, 12:55 PM   #61
Re: USAC and D2 Midgets
chtaylor
chtaylor is offline
Member

Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 82
 

???? Has USAC released any rules????? Are the rules on their website?? Or has someone just said these are the rules??
 
12/6/15, 1:37 PM   #62
AlaskaIndy
AlaskaIndy is offline
Member

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by chtaylor View Post
???? Has USAC released any rules????? Are the rules on their website?? Or has someone just said these are the rules??
www.midwestd2midgets.com

There is a tab for rules at the top of the page.
 
12/6/15, 1:46 PM   #63
AlaskaIndy
AlaskaIndy is offline
Member

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 69
 

So I have read the rules a few times and I am wondering one thing. I don't see where it specifies if you run a 1000cc bike motor that it has to be chain drive. TQ's run bike motors via shaft drive (not just the Honda with the cut case). If someone else sees that let me know but according to those rules it looks like that would be legal. The only reason I'm asking is that the bike motors might be better performance wise. You would obviously still have to meet the minimum weight rule for a shaft drive car which is 200 lbs. more which might negate any performance advantage. Just throwing it out there.
 
12/6/15, 1:47 PM   #64
Re: USAC and D2 Midgets
DAD
DAD is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,955
 

I never thought I would be reading that people thought the lowly little Mini Sprint was such an awesome racing machine. I and several others have been saying it for years and now it seems to be common knowledge that "MINI SPRINTS ARE GREAT".

We have been racing Mini Sprints since the early 90's. We started with the 600cc Uprights. Most of these cars were powered by the then new and revolutionary Honda F2 motorcycle engine. This little engine was something else. Honda had taken a major jump in motorcycle design when it came out with that little engine. It produced 90 Horsepower with only 600cc's or 30 cubic inches. We used the same chassis and running gear as a full Midget. In fact our second car was a one off chassis built by John Godfrey then building the Stealth Midget. Basically a midget chassis with a smaller top frame rail. John was the perfect guy to build as Mini Sprint because before Stealth john actually worked for another chassis builder that built Mini Sprints I think it was Stallard.

At this time the big boys in Mini Sprints were the 1200cc cars. They on the otherhand were powered by the conventional cycle motors of the day the 1200cc Suzuki and Kawasaki. These motors were large and heavy and required a lot of Money to make them perform. The guys up front were spending thousands of dollars with people like Orient Express and Hank Scott, engine builders for drag racers to run up front. They were very short lived and the 1200cc cars were dying from the inside out. You could race a Midget for what these guys were spending on Mini Sprints.

We had raced or little cars with the AMSA 1200cc Mini Sprints a couple of times and always managed to run up front racing against them. When Jerry found out we were only 600cc's he asked us to please find someplace else to run and banned us from competing with them. The 600cc class was growing and the 1200cc cars were in decline.

In 1999 Yamaha was intent on becoming competitive in motorcycle racing. They introduced the R1 and R6 motorcycles. They were small compact and very powerful. We installed a R6 on our 600cc car and went on a wining streak. Allen Rupenthal of ERC Racing was racing with us then and took notice of the little Yamaha's performance.The 600cc class was still growing and the 1200cc cars were in trouble. Allen's profession was building Mini Sprints. He reasoned that if the R6 was such a game changer could the R1 do the same thing. He acquired an R1 Motor installed it into a 600cc chassis and left the 600cc cars to race with the 1200cc AMSA. The R1 was just as powerful for it's size as the R6 was. Allen began wining races and selling cars.

This move by Yamaha also caused Honda, Suzuki and Kawasaki to take notice, and soon the 1000cc pocket rockets were everywhere. The AMSA began a growing spurt supported by all these new 1000cc motors and the old 1200cc motors disappeared from the scene to be replaced by cheap very powerful 1000cc motors. The AMSA grew so fast that soon 30 to 40 cars were not an unusual site in the pits.

Success can also cause problems. Although a weight limit was set by the AMSA they had no scales to enforce the rules. Jerry Teague the owner of the AMSA finally invested in a set of scales. This did not set too well with Allen. At about this time Bill May another prominent figure in Mini Sprint racing decided he wanted to come out of retirement and wanted to start another group. There were enough cars to actually support another so why not. The MMSA was formed with Allen Rupenthal as Owner and Bill May Race director.

Now we have COMPETITION between the two groups. To build his numbers Allen actually rented race cars to racers that were thinking about racing. The two groups carried on all the time building numbers mostly because of the availability of inexpensive power plants. The cycle Manufactures were also competing each one took turns on producing the most powerful motors. We had an unlimited supply of inexpensive motors and the sky was the limits.

Not So>>>other uses for these motors were being developed. We first saw the Bandits small cars that looked like race cars of the 50's, then along came the Mod Lite small cars designed like the open wheel modified, then we had the Mini Stock cars NASCAR wana be's and finally the sport car guys came out with several 1000cc classes for road racing.

All this time the 1000cc Mini Sprints were growing and competing with one another for market share. In 2010 Jerry and the AMSA managed to get a race for the 1200 cars at the Tulsa Shootout a major accomplishment for the Mini Sprint Racers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf1nrUunvBI
We had switched over to the MMSA that year but wanted to attend, so we changed car numbers got a driver and gave him a fictitious name and home town and entered. The Shoot out is neat but it is 99% waiting and 1% racing. The Ecotecs were also there racing I think for the second year and there car count wasn't too good. I watched their races with my trusty stop watch and I'll be darned they were turning the same times as the Mini Sprints. I though at the time that the two classes would and could race very well with one another. We did pretty good at Tulsa and I came back home and made my first post on IOW stating that the two classes should combine for the good of both classes.

For the last 5 years I have been pushing the idea and finally it has come to be. They decided to incorporate with a National rule plan, maybe a good idea maybe not. For some reason rules by committee tend to get complicated and unenforceable and filled with unimportant gobbly goop that just muddies the water. Rules made by a concerned owner-dictator seem to be simple concise and easy to enforce.

We have now entered into a new competition between D2 Midget classes, Mini Sprints Classes, and then again 1000cc mini Sprints and automotive powered Midgets within the same class. I love "COMPETITION" it has a tendency to make things better, it keeps people striving to out do the other and in turn things improve. In the next few years the competition will continue and things will improve if we can keep competition engineers from going in and attempting to fix a problem that may only exist in their minds. We don't need regulator we need innovators.

"In my own humble opinion" the race group or race motor that comes up with the biggest bang for the buck for will be the winner and in doing so racers will eventually be the real winners.

Honest Dad himself
 
2 members like this post: Cobra 14, Roy Bleckert
12/6/15, 11:19 PM   #65
99racing
99racing is offline
Member

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 61
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by 99racing View Post
now that there is rules is there going to more than one track in indiana using them?
No answers yet on this question,guessing this isn't going to be a class with any interest in this area!!
 
12/7/15, 9:10 AM   #66
Re: USAC and D2 Midgets
DAD
DAD is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,955
 

99

This is the Face Book Page for Indiana D2 racing. I don't believe there will be a track hosting them full time this year. I think a decision was made to tour within a small radius inside Indiana. So I guess you could say that several tracks have adopted the rules. The rules adopted apply to both USAC and PowrI. The schedule will probably be posted on their FB page when finalized.

Check Out Their FB Page https://www.facebook.com/MidwestD2Midgets/

Honest Dad himself
 
12/7/15, 9:39 AM   #67
Re: USAC and D2 Midgets
The Old Coyote
The Old Coyote is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,271
 

......"For some reason rules by committee tend to get complicated and unenforceable and filled with unimportant gobbly goop that just muddies the water".........

Dad,
You got that right. A zebra is a horse designed by a committee!
__________________
Real Race Cars Don't Have Fenders!
Ed
 
1 member likes this post: DAD
12/7/15, 9:31 PM   #68
Re: USAC and D2 Midgets
Revolution Racing
Revolution Racing is offline
Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 222
 

MAN, I'm so glad I don't do this for a living any more! I have not checked in here for a very long time, but you guys are still having the same discussion you were having last time I did. For that matter, you're still having the same discussion you were having in about 1999 before we started on the Focus program!

I admire those of you who are trying to do some good for the sport and I wish you all the luck in the world. You'll need it - you're dealing with Morons.

Keith
 
12/7/15, 10:13 PM   #69
Re: USAC and D2 Midgets
Vukie
Vukie is offline
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,310
 

https://www.facebook.com/MidwestD2Mi...74645935909046
 
12/8/15, 12:32 AM   #70
SteveB31
SteveB31 is offline
Member

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 203
 

This is a great discussion. For several years out here in Colorado, one track ran exactly what D2 midgets are in this discussion. Older midgets and 1000cc Lightning sprints. No weight rules at this track. Results were more races won by lightning sprints, so they are us lightning guys disconnect our shifters thinking that we were shifting to win. But, bottom line was great racing. Now, car counts have grown in this area, and lightning sprints run 20 or more cars per night , and midgets running round 20 per night. But, the concept brought out the cars to the race track, and that' s what we needed to help both classes grow. On another subject, it was mentioned in this thread that their is a shortage of 1000cc motors. I Don't see any shortage. Looked on eBay just now at several different popular 1000 cc motors, and lots for sale, between $1500 and $4000 depending on year and model. I bought 4 spare stock zx10 motors last year for myself (which should last me several years) for low $$$. I love the D2 concept if it gets more cars to the track, and it might just do it. It has worked well for the SSMS in Florida, and should bring a bunch of midgets out of mothballs that feel they cannot compete with the Toyotas and Esslingers that many of us cannot afford.
 
4 members like this post: Crankin, DAD, Tom23, Wayne Davis
Reply Indiana Open Wheel > Indiana Open Wheel Forum > USAC and D2 Midgets





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 4:07 AM.


Make IndianaOpenWheel.com your homepage
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
© 2005-2024 IndianaOpenWheel.com
Mobile VersionLinks: Dave Merritt - Chris Pedersen - Carey Fox - Carey Akin - Joe Bennett - Brandon Murray - Dave Roach - John DaDalt - Racin; With D.O. - Jackslash Media