Thread: No way out 40
View Single Post
3/28/16, 9:28 AM   #168
Re: No way out 40
Graham08
Graham08 is offline
Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 91
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueracer123 View Post
Yea sorry but your wrong. It would not hold up in court. Antitrust laws are in place so that no one person or corporation controls the entire market for one product or service. Aka, oil, cell phones, cars, ect. One track creating a rule that all four of the same tires on a car is not creating a monopoly.

If you don't like running all purple tires on your car. Do you have to race at that track? No! Just go to another track running your class that night and put on the other brand.

Now if every single track in the country said every single car had to run purple tires. Thus resoluting in the other brand going out of business. Then you can call monopoly and be angry about it.
Actually, it hasn't held up in court. Way back in the 80's, M&H sued over a track tire rule that spec'd Hoosiers somewhere up in the northeast. They lost. There was a similar suit in 2007 that was dismissed. Here's a link to an article talking about the 2007 suit that also references the 1984 ruling.

http://www.rubbernews.com/article/20...gainst-hoosier

I don't like spec tire rules in most instances, but that doesn't make them illegal.